Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38564060›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

The transition of medication overuse status by acute medication categories in episodic or chronic migraine patients to non-overuse status after receiving anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized control trial.

Chananchida Sirilertmekasakul, Akkanat Panto, Pattanan Lekhalawan, Pariyada Panyarachun, Porpim Jindasakchai, Wanakorn Rattanawong

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chananchida SirilertmekasakulFaculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand.
Akkanat PantoFaculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand.
Pattanan LekhalawanFaculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand.
Pariyada PanyarachunFaculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand.
Porpim JindasakchaiFaculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand.
Wanakorn RattanawongFaculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand. wanakorn.ra@kmitl.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7277-9699
King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine whether patients with episodic (EM) or chronic migraine (CM), who were treated with anti-CGRP antibodies, showed a reversal from medication overuse (MO) or medication overuse headache (MOH) status at their baseline to non-overuse status. Furthermore, this study aimed to establish which acute headache medication (AHM) categories responded more effectively to anti-CGRP antibodies.

methodsA systematic search was conducted in the PubMed database for relevant studies from January 2013 to September 2023. We included phase three randomized controlled trials to examine the role of anti-CGRP antibodies in patients with EM or CM and their MO status. A meta-analysis was conducted to find the association between anti-CGRP antibodies and the number of EM and CM patients with MO or MOH at baseline that reverted to non-MO status or below the MOH threshold.

resultsThe initial search yielded a total of 345 studies. After removing duplicates and screening with inclusion criteria, 5 studies fulfilled our conditions. Each study reviewed the response to changes in the MO status of patients after receiving anti-CGRP antibodies, including eptinezumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and erenumab, compared to placebo. Our study analyzed three AHM categories: triptans, simple analgesics, and multiple drugs. The overall relative risk (RR) was 1.44 (95% CI, 1.31 to 1.59; p < 0.001). The RRs for triptans, simple analgesics, and multi-drug groups were 1.71 (95% CI, 1.53 to 1.91; p < 0.001), 1.10 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.47; p = 0.5), and 1.29 (95%CI 1.14 to 1.46; p < 0.001) respectively.

conclusionThe meta-analysis has shown that anti-CGRP antibodies were statistically significant in transitioning from MO or MOH status to non-MO status or below the MOH threshold (RR = 1.44) for all included studies and all AHM categories except for simple analgesics. Patients from the triptan group had the highest RR of 1.71 with a p-value < 0.001, while the simple analgesics group had an RR of 1.10, however, with a p-value > 0.05. Interestingly, this analysis can be interpreted as that anti-CGRP antibodies might not be effective in reducing simple analgesics use in EM or CM patients. Further studies are needed to investigate these matters.

Indexed as

Headache Disorders, SecondaryMigraine DisordersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesicsAntibodies, MonoclonalCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicHumansAnalgesicsAntibodies, MonoclonalCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsAnti-CGRP monoclonal antibodiesMedication overuse headacheMultiple drugsNsaidsTriptans

Identifiers

PMID38564060
OpenAlexW4393443007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.