ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2024
Inconsistent excipient listings in DailyMed: implications for drug safety.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Excipients, or inactive ingredients, are a frequent cause of medication intolerance and allergy. Patients and clinicians concerned about medication allergies and sensitivities rely on the U.S. National Library of Medicine's DailyMed for accurate lists of excipients. Based on our anecdotal discovery of several examples of excipient omissions, we wished to examine the accuracy of DailyMed's listings more systematically in a sample of commonly prescribed medications. The objective of the study is to identify the frequency of inconsistency of excipient reporting within the DailyMed website. We performed a database audit of the Structured Product Labeling XML file provided by the drug manufacturer to the Food and Drug Administration and DailyMed for two randomly selected formulations of each of 50 commonly prescribed medications. For each of the 100 formulations, we compared the excipients listed in the "Description" to those in the "Ingredients and Appearance" sections in DailyMed. The Structured Product Labeling data file provided by the drug manufacturer contained internal inconsistencies of excipients in 39% of the formulations examined. Despite the use of Structured Product Labeling, the drug manufacturer's medication labels provided to the FDA and reported by DailyMed often contain conflicting information about inactive ingredients. Patients with allergies and excipient sensitivity should be aware of these discrepancies and consult multiple sections of the label to identify potential allergy-inducing inactive ingredients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.