Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38563586›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2024

Corneal biomechanics are not exclusively compromised in high myopia.

Fabian Yii, Niall Strang, Miguel O Bernabeu, Baljean Dhillon, Tom MacGillivray

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Retinal Changes From Hyperopia to Myopia: Not All Diopters Are Created Equal.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fabian YiiCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4730-7363
Niall StrangDepartment of Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Miguel O BernabeuCentre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Baljean DhillonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Tom MacGillivrayCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine · GBGlasgow Caledonian University · GBNHS Lothian · GBThe Queen's Medical Research Institute · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N013166/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionResearch assuming linearity has concluded that corneal biomechanics are compromised in high myopia. We investigated whether this assumption was appropriate and re-examined these associations across different levels of myopia.

methodsMyopic (spherical equivalent refraction, SER ≤ -0.50 D) eyes of 10,488 adults aged 40-69 years without any history of systemic and ocular conditions were identified in the UK Biobank. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression was employed to test the linear association between corneal hysteresis (CH) or corneal resistance factor (CRF), separately, and SER while controlling for age, sex, corneal radius and intraocular pressure. Quantile regression (QR) was used to test the same set of associations across 49 equally spaced conditional quantiles of SER.

resultsIn OLS regression, each standard deviation (SD) decrease in CH and CRF was associated with 0.08 D (95% CI: 0.04-0.12; p < 0.001) and 0.10 D (95% CI: 0.04-0.15; p < 0.001) higher myopia, respectively. However, residual analysis indicated that the linearity assumption was violated. QR revealed no evidence of a significant association between CH/CRF and SER in low myopia, but a significant (p < 0.05) positive association became evident from -2.78 D (0.06 and 0.08 D higher myopia per SD decrease in CH and CRF). The magnitude of association increased exponentially with increasing myopia: in the -5.03 D quantile, every SD decrease in CH and CRF was associated with 0.17 D (95% CI: 0.08-0.25; p < 0.001) and 0.21 D (95% CI: 0.10-0.31; p < 0.001) higher myopia. In the -8.63 D quantile, this further increased to 0.54 D (95% CI: 0.33-0.76; p < 0.001) and 0.67 D (95% CI: 0.41-0.93; p < 0.001) higher myopia per SD decrease in CH and CRF.

conclusionsCorneal biomechanics appeared compromised from around -3.00 D. These changes were observed to be exponential with increasing myopia.

Indexed as

CorneaIntraocular PressureRefraction, OcularAdultAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaElasticityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyopiaMyopia, Degenerativecorneal biomechanicscorneal hysteresiscorneal resistance factormyopia

Identifiers

PMID38563586
PMCPMC12862013
OpenAlexW4393409637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.