Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38563377›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Current Trends in Hypertension Identification and Management: Insights from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) Following the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guidelines.

Joseph Heaton, Abbas Alshami, Steven Imburgio, Anton Mararenko, Matthew Schoenfeld, Brett Sealove, Arif Asif, Jesus Almendral

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Non-linear Association of CAR with all-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Coronary Heart Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study from NHANES.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph HeatonDepartment of Medicine Jersey Shore University Medical Center Neptune City NJ.ORCID 0000-0002-2181-3823
Abbas AlshamiDivision of Cardiology Jersey Shore University Medical Center Neptune City NJ.ORCID 0000-0003-0726-3498
Steven ImburgioDepartment of Medicine Jersey Shore University Medical Center Neptune City NJ.ORCID 0000-0003-4963-5931
Anton MararenkoDivision of Cardiology Jersey Shore University Medical Center Neptune City NJ.
Matthew SchoenfeldDivision of Cardiology Jersey Shore University Medical Center Neptune City NJ.
Brett SealoveDivision of Cardiology Jersey Shore University Medical Center Neptune City NJ.ORCID 0000-0002-8417-8302
Arif AsifDepartment of Medicine Jersey Shore University Medical Center Neptune City NJ.
Jesus AlmendralDivision of Cardiology Jersey Shore University Medical Center Neptune City NJ.ORCID 0000-0003-0623-7183
Jersey Shore University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension is a global health issue associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to investigate contemporary hypertension identification and management trends following the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. METHODS AND

resultsData from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted from 2017 to 2020 were analyzed. Participants between 20 and 79 years of age were included. Participants were stratified into different treatment groups based on indication and guideline adherence. Descriptive statistics were used to compare medication use, diagnosis rates, and blood pressure control. A total of 265 402 026 people met the inclusion criteria, of which 19.0% (n=50 349 209) were undergoing guideline antihypertensive management. In the guideline antihypertensive management group, a single antihypertensive class was used to treat 45.7% of participants, and 55.2% had uncontrolled blood pressure. Participants not undergoing guideline antihypertensive management qualified for primary prevention in 11.5% (n=24 741 999) of cases and for secondary prevention in 2.4% (n=5 070 044) of cases; of these, 66.3% (n=19 774 007) did not know they may have hypertension and were not on antihypertensive medication.

conclusionsAdherence to guidelines for antihypertensive management is suboptimal. Over half of patients undergoing guideline treatment had uncontrolled blood pressure. One-third of qualifying participants may not be receiving treatment. Education and medical management were missing for 2 in 3 qualifying participants. Addressing these deficiencies is crucial for improving blood pressure control and reducing cardiovascular event outcomes.

Indexed as

CardiologyHypertensionAmerican Heart AssociationAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHumansNutrition SurveysUnited StatesAntihypertensive Agentsadherencediagnosisguideline‐directed medical therapyhypertensionmanagement

Identifiers

PMID38563377
PMCPMC11262485
OpenAlexW4393421589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.