ArticleVeterinary ophthalmology2024
Validation of the eyeTelemed IOPvet indentation tonometer for use in dogs.
Article in Veterinary ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Initial assessment of a species-specific rebound measurement mode for non-human primates.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Validation of Recalibrated IOPVet in Canine Eyes Compared to Manometry and Recalibrated TONOVET Plus.Veterinary ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Validation of the EYEMATE-SC Suprachoroidal Pressure Transducer for Telemetric Measurement of Intraocular Pressure in Normal Ex Vivo Canine and Equine Globes-Preliminary Results.Veterinary ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Validation of the eyeTelemed IOPvet indentation tonometer for use in dogs.Veterinary ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the accuracy of canine intraocular pressure (IOP) estimates from the eyeTelemed IOPvet indentation tonometer. ANIMALS STUDIED: Part 1 included 54 eyes from 28 Beagle dogs-23 ADAMTS10-mutants with open-angle glaucoma and 5 normals. Part 2 involved five normal canine ex vivo globes. PROCEDURE: Part 1 (in vivo) compared IOPvet estimates in normal and glaucomatous dogs to Reichert Tono-Vera® Vet rebound tonometry. The three IOPvet estimates were green (normal; <20 mmHg, according to the manufacturer), yellow (elevated; 20-30 mmHg), and red (high; >30 mmHg). In Part 2 (ex vivo), the pressure inside freshly enucleated normal canine eyes was progressively increased from 5 to 80 mmHg and compared to IOPvet estimates. Descriptive statistics compared IOPvet estimates to rebound tonometry and direct manometry, with the threshold from normal to glaucoma set at 30 mmHg.
resultsIn Part 1 (in vivo), normal pressures (≤30 mmHg) were mainly identified correctly as green or yellow-110 of 111 estimates, corresponding to a specificity of 99%. Only 16 of 125 affected estimates were correctly displayed in the >30-mmHg range; the remaining 109 showed ≤30 mmHg, corresponding to a sensitivity of 13%. In Part 2 (ex vivo), all normal pressures were correctly estimated with green, but 64 of 88 manometric IOPs >30 mmHg were falsely estimated as 20-30 mmHg.
conclusionsThe IOPvet is inaccurate in estimating canine IOP with a low sensitivity at identifying dogs with IOP > 30 mmHg. Canine-specific instrument revision is required to correctly identify elevated (yellow = 20-30 mmHg) and high (red >30 mmHg) IOPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.