Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38563079›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2024

Emergency surgery preoperative delays: realities, economic impacts and gains of a second emergency operating theatre.

Á Lucey, S Beecher, R McLaughlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Á LuceyDepartment of General Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Ireland.
S BeecherDepartment of General Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Ireland.
R McLaughlinDepartment of General Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTime-to-theatre (TTT) is a key performance indicator of theatre efficiency and delayed TTT incurs significant costs and poor clinical outcomes. An increasing Irish population in conjunction with an ageing population puts increasing pressure on emergency surgical services across Ireland. We examined our institution's experience with introducing a second emergency theatre and semi-elective theatre lists for acute surgical patients.

methodsA retrospective review of electronic, prospectively maintained databases was performed between 1 February 2018 and 31 January 2020. A cost analysis was conducted to assess the economic impact of delayed TTT. The cost-saving benefit of introducing a second emergency theatre and semi-elective Kaizen lists was then calculated and compared with 2012-2014 figures from our institution.

resultsIn total, 6,679 procedures were performed. Overall mean TTT was 16h, 10h shorter than before the introduction of a second emergency theatre and Kaizen theatre lists (

conclusionInvestment in emergency surgical services resulted in more efficient access to emergency theatres. There was a reduction in out-of-hours operating across all specialties and across the more at-risk groups such as those over the age of 65, who had an overall reduction in TTT. This had significant financial benefits and likely reduced the clinical risk associated with delayed TTT and out-of-hours operating.

Indexed as

Operating RoomsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCost-Benefit AnalysisEmergenciesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansIrelandMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurgical Procedures, OperativeTime FactorsTime-to-TreatmentCostEmergency theatreKaizenTime-to-theatre

Identifiers

PMID38563079
PMCPMC11214858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.