ArticleThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2024
Mapping veterinary care in Canada: An index of care accessibility.
Article in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding regulatory, structural, and relational barriers to offering accessible veterinary care: Results from a qualitative study of Canadian care providers.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2026Article
- How do accessible veterinary care providers evaluate programmes and engage communities? Results of a qualitative analysis of Canadian service providers.The Veterinary record · 2025Article
- Access to veterinary care in Canada: a cross-sectional survey of animal healthcare organizations and interventions.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Access to veterinary care has been identified as the largest animal welfare issue in contemporary society. Access to veterinary care is complicated by several factors, including the cost of care, potential language differences between providers and clients, the number of care providers, and distance to a care provider. Each of these factors alone can impact an individual's ability to seek adequate veterinary medical care for their companion animal, with an additional burden when multiple factors are present. Procedure: A veterinary care accessibility score (VCAS) was created, consisting of key variables for Canada, that measured these factors and scored them in relation to the rest of the country at the census division level. Results: In this study, nearly 2 million households in Quebec and 700 000 in Ontario were in the lowest VCAS ranking. Further, nearly 75% of households in New Brunswick were in low-access census divisions. The ratios of care providers to the estimated numbers of pet-owning households and households were also derived. An estimated veterinary clinic employee shortage was calculated at a minimum of 6803 to simply bring every census division up to a weighted mean, although the actual shortage is likely higher. Conclusion: This research could be used by policymakers, funders, and the animal welfare community to prioritize investment and design targeted solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38562985PMC10945453What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.