Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38562973›Full record

ReviewThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2024

Basic triage in dogs and cats: Part III.

Laura Ilie, Elizabeth Thomovsky

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura IlieEmergency and Critical Care, VCA Arboretum View Animal Hospital, 2551 Warrenville Road, Downers Grove, Illinois 60515, USA (Ilie); Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Purdue University, 625 Harrison Street, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA (Thomovsky).
Elizabeth ThomovskyEmergency and Critical Care, VCA Arboretum View Animal Hospital, 2551 Warrenville Road, Downers Grove, Illinois 60515, USA (Ilie); Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Purdue University, 625 Harrison Street, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA (Thomovsky).
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Emergency cases can be presented at any time of the day or night. All small animal practitioners need to have the skills to triage and stabilize common emergency cases, even if the ultimate goal is to refer the animal to another facility. Objective and procedure: The third and final part of this 3-part review article series discusses arrhythmias typical in emergency cases and the approach to animals that are presented with an inability to stand up and walk normally. A stepwise method to categorize and stabilize these cases is outlined, along with helpful tips to optimize the referral experience, if indicated. Results: Recognizing and knowing how to treat tachy- and bradyarrhythmias is important in stabilizing a dog's or cat's condition. Understanding how to differentiate the various reasons that a dog or cat is unable to stand on its own allows a veterinarian to both treat and communicate outcome expectations for those animals. Conclusion and clinical relevance: Do not refer emergent cases before basic stabilization is completed. Many emergency cases can either be worked up by the primary veterinarian or sent to a referral clinic on an appointment basis after appropriate stabilization steps have occurred.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesDog DiseasesVeterinariansAnimalsCatsDogsHumansTriage

Identifiers

PMID38562973
PMCPMC10945444
OpenAlexW4394765028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.