Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38562873›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

The impact of a conditional financial incentive on linkage to HIV care: Findings from the HITS cluster randomized clinical trial in rural South Africa.

Hae-Young Kim, Maxime Inghels, Thulile Mathenjwa, Maryam Shahmanesh, Janet Seeley, Phillippa Matthews, Nuala McGrath, Oluwafemi Adeagbo, Dickman Gareta, H Manisha Yapa and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03757104 (Home-based Interventions to Test and Start), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03757104 naunknown statusnot on this map

Home-based Interventions to Test and Start (HITS): a Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Mortality and Incidence Through HIV Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorAfrica Health Research InstituteRan2018 to 2022Enrolled4,667ConditionsHIV, HIV Testing, Linkage to CareArmsmicro-incentive, EPIC-HIV, micro-incentive and EPIC-HIV
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.

Maxime Inghels
Thulile Mathenjwa
Maryam Shahmanesh
Janet Seeley
Phillippa Matthews
Nuala McGrath
Oluwafemi Adeagbo
Dickman Gareta
H Manisha Yapa
Thembelihle Zuma
Adrian Dobra
Till Bärnighausen
Frank Tanser
Africa Health Research Institute · ZAHeidelberg University · DELondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNew York University · USStellenbosch University · ZAThe George Institute for Global Health · GBThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Lincoln · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of Washington · USUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: HIV elimination requires innovative approaches to ensure testing and immediate treatment provision. We investigated the effectiveness of conditional financial incentives on increasing linkage to HIV care in a 2×2 factorial cluster randomized controlled trial-Home-Based Intervention to Test and Start (HITS) - in rural South Africa. Methods: Of 45 communities in uMkhanyakude, KwaZulu-Natal, 16 communities were randomly assigned to the arms to receive financial incentives for home-based HIV counseling and testing (HBHCT) and linkage to care within 6 weeks (R50 [US$3] food voucher each) and 29 communities to the arms without financial incentives. We examined linkage to care (i.e., initiation or resumption of antiretroviral therapy after >3 months of care interruption) at local clinics within 6 weeks of a home visit, the eligibility period to receive the second financial incentive. Linkage to care was ascertained from individual clinical records. Intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) was performed using modified Poisson regression with adjustment for receiving another intervention (i.e., male-targeted HIV-specific decision support app) and clustering of standard errors at the community level. Results: Among 13,894 eligible men (i.e., ≥15 years and resident in the 45 communities), 20.7% received HBHCT, which resulted in 122 HIV-positive tests. Of these, 27 linked to care within 6 weeks of HBHCT. Additionally, of eligible men who did not receive HBHCT, 66 linked to care. In the ITT analysis, the proportion of linkage to care among men did not differ in the arms which received financial incentives and those without financial incentives (adjusted Risk Ratio [aRR]=0.78, 95% CI: 0.51-1.21). Among 19,884 eligible women, 29.1% received HBHCT, which resulted in 375 HIV-positive tests. Of these, 75 linked to care. Among eligible women who did not receive HBHCT, 121 linked to care within 6 weeks. Women in the financial incentive arms had a significantly higher probability of linkage to care, compared to those in the arms without financial incentives (aRR=1.50; 95% CI: 1.03-2.21). Conclusion: While a small once-off financial incentive did not increase linkage to care among men during the eligibility period of 6 weeks, it significantly improved linkage to care among women over the same period. Clinical Trial Number: ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT03757104.

Identifiers

PMID38562873
PMCPMC10984055
OpenAlexW4392967094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.