ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
Multicenter Development and Prospective Validation of eCARTv5: A Gradient Boosted Machine Learning Early Warning Score.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEarly detection of clinical deterioration using machine learning early warning scores may improve outcomes. However, most implemented scores were developed using logistic regression, only underwent retrospective validation, and were not tested in important subgroups. Our objective was to develop and prospectively validate a gradient boosted machine model (eCARTv5) for identifying clinical deterioration on the wards.
designMulticenter retrospective and prospective observational study.
settingInpatient admissions to the medical-surgical wards at seven hospitals in three health systems for model development (2006-2022) and at 21 hospitals from three health systems for retrospective (2009-2023) and prospective (2023-2024) external validation. PATIENTS: All adult patients hospitalized at each participating health system during the study years.
interventionsNone MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsPredictor variables (demographics, vital signs, documentation, and laboratory values) were used in a gradient boosted trees algorithm to predict intensive care unit transfer or death in the next 24 hours. The developed model (eCART) was compared to the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The development cohort included 901,491 admissions, the retrospective validation cohort included 1,769,461 admissions, and the prospective validation cohort included 205,946 admissions. In retrospective validation, eCART had the highest AUROC (0.835; 95%CI 0.834, 0.835), followed by NEWS (0.766 (95%CI 0.766, 0.767)), and MEWS (0.704 (95%CI 0.703, 0.704)). eCART's performance remained high (AUROC ≥0.80) across a range of patient demographics, clinical conditions, and during prospective validation.
conclusionsWe developed eCART, which performed better than the NEWS and MEWS retrospectively, prospectively, and across a range of subgroups. These results served as the foundation for Food and Drug Administration clearance for its use in identifying deterioration in hospitalized ward patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.