ArticleResearch square2024
Early Impressions and Adoption of the AtriAmp for Managing Arrhythmias Following Congenital Heart Surgery.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: AtriAmp is a new medical device that displays a continuous real-time atrial electrogram on telemetry using temporary atrial pacing leads. Our objective was to evaluate early adoption of this device into patient care, understand how it affected clinical workflow, and identify unforeseen benefits or limitations. Design: Qualitative study using inductive analysis of semi-structured interviews to identify dominant themes. Setting: Single center, tertiary, academic 21-bed mixed pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Subjects: PICU multidisciplinary team members (Pediatric intensivists, PICU Nurse Practitioners, PICU nurses and Pediatric Cardiologists) who were early adopters of the AtriAmp (n=14). Results: Three prominent themes emerged from qualitative analysis of the early adopters' experiences. (1) Accelerated time from arrhythmia event to diagnosis, treatment, and determination of treatment effectiveness; (2) Increased confidence and security in the accuracy of providers' arrhythmia diagnosis; and (3) Improvement in the ability to educate providers about post-operative arrythmias where reliance on time consuming consultation is a default. Providers also noted some learning curves with the device; none of which compromised medical care or clinical workflow. Conclusions: Insights from early adopters of AtriAmp signal the need for simplicity and fidelity in new technologies within the PICU. Further research in the qualitative and observational sphere is needed to understand how technologies, such as AtriAmp, find expanded use in the PICU environment. Our research suggests that such technologies can be pivotal to the support and growth of multi-disciplinary teams, even among those who do not participate in early implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.