ArticleFrontiers in big data2024
Data pipeline for real-time energy consumption data management and prediction.
Article in Frontiers in big data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- UKB-MDRMF: a multi-disease risk and multimorbidity framework based on UK biobank data.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the increasing utilization of data in various industries and applications, constructing an efficient data pipeline has become crucial. In this study, we propose a machine learning operations-centric data pipeline specifically designed for an energy consumption management system. This pipeline seamlessly integrates the machine learning model with real-time data management and prediction capabilities. The overall architecture of our proposed pipeline comprises several key components, including Kafka, InfluxDB, Telegraf, Zookeeper, and Grafana. To enable accurate energy consumption predictions, we adopt two time-series prediction models, long short-term memory (LSTM), and seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA). Our analysis reveals a clear trade-off between speed and accuracy, where SARIMA exhibits faster model learning time while LSTM outperforms SARIMA in prediction accuracy. To validate the effectiveness of our pipeline, we measure the overall processing time by optimizing the configuration of Telegraf, which directly impacts the load in the pipeline. The results are promising, as our pipeline achieves an average end-to-end processing time of only 0.39 s for handling 10,000 data records and an impressive 1.26 s when scaling up to 100,000 records. This indicates 30.69-90.88 times faster processing compared to the existing Python-based approach. Additionally, when the number of records increases by ten times, the increased overhead is reduced by 3.07 times. This verifies that the proposed pipeline exhibits an efficient and scalable structure suitable for real-time environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.