ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Quantification of Metamorphopsia in Resolved Idiopathic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: An Analysis Using M-CHARTS, Amsler Grid, and Optical Coherence Tomography.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is metamorphopsia more important than visual acuity in vitreomacular interface disorders? A scoping review.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2026Article
- The Amsler Grid in Everyday Practice: A Review of Its Role and Limitations in Primary Care.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To quantify metamorphopsia in patients with resolved idiopathic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSCR) using M-CHARTS and compare the results with the traditional Amsler grid and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Patients and Methods: For the purpose of this study, all consecutive cases of patients with resolved CSCR were evaluated for metamorphopsia (using the standard Amsler grid and M-CHARTS) and spectral domain OCT. The OCT images were analyzed for the following five parameters: central macular thickness, pigment epithelial detachment, retinal pigment epithelial bumps, discontinuation in the inner segment/outer segment junction or the external limiting membrane, fibrinous exudates in the subretinal space, and hyperreflective dots in the intraretinal and/or subretinal layer. Binary logistic regression was used to find the association between metamorphopsia and foveal morphology. Cohen's Kappa was used to determine the agreement between the M-CHARTS and Amsler grid for diagnosing metamorphopsia. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the diagnosis of metamorphopsia were calculated against the Amsler grid. Results: Of 41 eyes, Amsler Grid detected metamorphopsia in 39.02%, and M-CHARTS detected metamorphopsia in 53.66%. The agreement rate of detection between the two tests was moderate (Kappa=0.52). M-CHARTS had a sensitivity of 87.50%, a specificity of 68.00%, a positive predictive value of 63.64%; and a negative predictive value of 89.47% for the diagnosis of metamorphopsia compared to the Amsler grid. The presence of PED in OCT was significantly associated with metamorphopsia. Conclusion: M-CHARTS can be a useful ancillary test to detect and quantify metamorphopsia even after fluid resolution in CSCR. Structural changes in macular morphology as observed with OCT can predict the likelihood of metamorphopsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.