Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38562610›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2024

Preclinical Efficacy of Cabazitaxel Loaded Poly(2-alkyl cyanoacrylate) Nanoparticle Variants.

Remya Valsalakumari, Abhilash D Pandya, Lina Prasmickaite, Audun Kvalvaag, Anne Grethe Myrann, Andreas K O Åslund, Marianne Steinsvik Kjos, Cristina Fontecha-Cuenca, Hajira B Haroon, Ana R S Ribeiro and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Remya ValsalakumariDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, 0379, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8064-4268
Abhilash D Pandya *Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, 0379, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7713-3050
Lina Prasmickaite *Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, 0379, Norway.
Audun KvalvaagDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, 0379, Norway.
Anne Grethe MyrannDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, 0379, Norway.
Andreas K O ÅslundDepartment of Biotechnology and Nanomedicine, SINTEF AS, Trondheim, 7034, Norway.
Marianne Steinsvik KjosDepartment of Biotechnology and Nanomedicine, SINTEF AS, Trondheim, 7034, Norway.
Cristina Fontecha-CuencaSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Hajira B HaroonSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Ana R S RibeiroDepartment of Biosciences and Medical Biology, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, 5020, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6357-6670
Jutta Horejs-HoeckDepartment of Biosciences and Medical Biology, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, 5020, Austria.
S Moein MoghimiSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Ýrr MørchDepartment of Biotechnology and Nanomedicine, SINTEF AS, Trondheim, 7034, Norway.
Tore SkotlandDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, 0379, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6524-612X
Kirsten SandvigDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, 0379, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4174-9072
Gunhild Mari MælandsmoDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, 0379, Norway.
Tore Geir IversenDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, 0379, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOSINTEF · NOUniversity of Salzburg · ATNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Biodegradable poly(alkyl cyanoacrylate) (PACA) nanoparticles (NPs) are receiving increasing attention in anti-cancer nanomedicine development not only for targeted cancer chemotherapy, but also for modulation of the tumor microenvironment. We previously reported promising results with cabazitaxel (CBZ) loaded poly(2-ethylbutyl cyanoacrylate) NPs (PEBCA-CBZ NPs) in a patient derived xenograft (PDX) model of triple-negative breast cancer, and this was associated with a decrease in M2 macrophages. The present study aims at comparing two endotoxin-free PACA NP variants (PEBCA and poly(2-ethylhexyl cyanoacrylate); PEHCA), loaded with CBZ and test whether conjugation with folate would improve their effect. Methods: Cytotoxicity assays and cellular uptake of NPs by flow cytometry were performed in different breast cancer cells. Biodistribution and efficacy studies were performed in PDX models of breast cancer. Tumor associated immune cells were analyzed by multiparametric flow cytometry. Results: In vitro studies showed similar NP-induced cytotoxicity patterns despite difference in early NP internalization. On intravenous injection, the liver cleared the majority of NPs. Efficacy studies in the HBCx39 PDX model demonstrated an enhanced effect of drug-loaded PEBCA variants compared with free drug and PEHCA NPs. Furthermore, the folate conjugated PEBCA variant did not show any enhanced effects compared with the unconjugated counterpart which might be due to unfavorable orientation of folate on the NPs. Finally, analyses of the immune cell populations in tumors revealed that treatment with drug loaded PEBCA variants affected the myeloid cells, especially macrophages, contributing to an inflammatory, immune activated tumor microenvironment. Conclusion: We report for the first time, comparative efficacy of PEBCA and PEHCA NP variants in triple negative breast cancer models and show that CBZ-loaded PEBCA NPs exhibit a combined effect on tumor cells and on the tumor associated myeloid compartment, which may boost the anti-tumor response.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNanoparticlesTaxoidsCell Line, TumorCyanoacrylatesDrug CarriersFemaleFolic AcidHumansTissue DistributionTumor MicroenvironmentcabazitaxelCyanoacrylatesDrug CarriersFolic AcidpolyethylbutylcyanoacrylateTaxoidsbreast cancercabazitaxelpatient-derived xenograftpoly(alkyl cyanoacrylate)tumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID38562610
PMCPMC10982070
OpenAlexW4393204740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.