Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38562530›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nephrology and renovascular disease2024

Acute Kidney Injury Prediction Model Using Cystatin-C, Beta-2 Microglobulin, and Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin Biomarker in Sepsis Patients.

Hani Susianti, Aswoco Andyk Asmoro, Sujarwoto, Wiwi Jaya, Heri Sutanto, Amanda Yuanita Kusdijanto, Kevin Putro Kuwoyo, Kristian Hananto, Matthew Brian Khrisna

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hani SusiantiClinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine Brawijaya University/Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-4019-9109
Aswoco Andyk AsmoroAnesthesiology and Intensive Therapy Department, Faculty of Medicine Brawijaya University/Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia.
SujarwotoFaculty of Public Administration, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia.
Wiwi JayaAnesthesiology and Intensive Therapy Department, Faculty of Medicine Brawijaya University/Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia.
Heri SutantoInternal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine Brawijaya University/Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia.
Amanda Yuanita KusdijantoClinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine Brawijaya University/Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia.
Kevin Putro KuwoyoClinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine Brawijaya University/Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia.
Kristian HanantoFaculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia.
Matthew Brian KhrisnaClinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine Brawijaya University/Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia.
University of Brawijaya · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: AKI is a frequent complication in sepsis patients and is estimated to occur in almost half of patients with severe sepsis. However, there is currently no effective therapy for AKI in sepsis. Therefore, the therapeutic approach is focused on prevention. Based on this, there is an opportunity to examine a panel of biomarker models for predicting AKI. Material and Methods: This prospective cohort study analysed the differences in Cystatin C, Beta-2 Microglobulin, and NGAL levels in sepsis patients with AKI and sepsis patients without AKI. The biomarker modelling of AKI prediction was done using machine learning, namely Orange Data Mining. In this study, 130 samples were analysed by machine learning. The parameters used to obtain the biomarker panel were 23 laboratory examination parameters. Results: This study used SVM and the Naïve Bayes model of machine learning. The SVM model's sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV were 50%, 94.4%, 71.4%, and 87.5%, respectively. For the Naïve Bayes model, the sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV were 83.3%, 77.8%, 87.5%, and 71.4%, respectively. Discussion: This study's SVM machine learning model has higher AUC and specificity but lower sensitivity. The Naïve Bayes model had better sensitivity; it can be used to predict AKI in sepsis patients. Conclusion: The Naïve Bayes machine learning model in this study is useful for predicting AKI in sepsis patients.

Indexed as

AKIBeta-2 MicroglobulinCystatin Cmachine learningNGALsepsis

Identifiers

PMID38562530
PMCPMC10984190
OpenAlexW4393269879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.