Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38562283›Full record

ReviewNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Linking fast and slow: The case for generative models.

Johan Medrano, Karl Friston, Peter Zeidman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Free Energy Principle and Free Markets.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. BSD: A Bayesian Framework for Parametric Models of Neural Spectra.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johan MedranoThe Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7558-2071
Karl FristonThe Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7984-8909
Peter ZeidmanThe Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3610-6619

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A pervasive challenge in neuroscience is testing whether neuronal connectivity changes over time due to specific causes, such as stimuli, events, or clinical interventions. Recent hardware innovations and falling data storage costs enable longer, more naturalistic neuronal recordings. The implicit opportunity for understanding the self-organised brain calls for new analysis methods that link temporal scales: from the order of milliseconds over which neuronal dynamics evolve, to the order of minutes, days, or even years over which experimental observations unfold. This review article demonstrates how hierarchical generative models and Bayesian inference help to characterise neuronal activity across different time scales. Crucially, these methods go beyond describing statistical associations among observations and enable inference about underlying mechanisms. We offer an overview of fundamental concepts in state-space modeling and suggest a taxonomy for these methods. Additionally, we introduce key mathematical principles that underscore a separation of temporal scales, such as the slaving principle, and review Bayesian methods that are being used to test hypotheses about the brain with multiscale data. We hope that this review will serve as a useful primer for experimental and computational neuroscientists on the state of the art and current directions of travel in the complex systems modelling literature.

Indexed as

Bayesian statisticsDynamical systemsGenerative modelsHidden Markov modelsHierarchical modellingTemporal scales

Identifiers

PMID38562283
PMCPMC10861163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.