ReviewCureus2024
Humor and Quality of Life in Adults With Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A pilot study of body-mind-spirit group therapy on sleep and quality of life in individuals with visual impairment.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Mental health-related quality of life mediates the association between psychosocial factors and medication adherence in rheumatoid arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Article
- Coping and Resilience in Chinese Couples with Connective Tissue Diseases: A Culturally Informed Qualitative Explanation.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Empowerment Model for The Elderly and Community to Improve the Welfare of the Elderly.F1000Research · 2026Article
- Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes and Their Perspectives on Diabetes-Related Social Media: Qualitative Study.JMIR diabetes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals grappling with chronic ailments often undergo a deterioration in their overall quality of life (QoL), encompassing psychological, social, and physical dimensions of well-being. Acknowledging that humor has demonstrated the potential to engender favorable effects on QoL, this systematic review endeavors to investigate the correlation between humor and QoL among adults contending with chronic health conditions. A comprehensive review of quantitative data was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL) were comprehensively searched from the establishment of each database up to June 22, 2023. Furthermore, reference lists of the included datasets and pertinent review articles were scrutinized exhaustively. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was employed to assess the quality of eligible studies. A total of 18 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. These studies encompassed a diverse spectrum of chronic disease categories (including cardiovascular diseases, various types of cancer, etc.) and collectively involved a participant cohort comprising 4,325 individuals. Remarkable findings surfaced, indicating a noteworthy association between distinct facets of humor-such as one's sense of humor, coping humor, humor styles, and laughter-and psychological QoL. Nonetheless, the relationship between humor and physical QoL exhibited a more intricate pattern, characterized by mixed outcomes. Despite the limited and inconsistent evidence across studies, humor appears to exhibit a positive association with QoL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.