ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2024
Study on Predicting Clinical Stage of Patients with Bronchial Asthma Based on CT Radiomics.
Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated identification of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma using impulse oscillometry combined with quantitative computed tomography parameters and radiomics features.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in thyroid ultrasound: clinical applications and perspectives.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the value of a new model based on CT radiomics in predicting the staging of patients with bronchial asthma (BA). Methods: Patients with BA from 2018 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and underwent plain chest CT before treatment. According to the guidelines for the prevention and treatment of BA (2016 edition), they were divided into two groups: acute attack and non-acute attack. The images were processed as follows: using Lung Kit software for image standardization and segmentation, using AK software for image feature extraction, and using R language for data analysis and model construction (training set: test set = 7: 3). The efficacy and clinical effects of the constructed model were evaluated with ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, calibration curve and decision curve. Results: A total of 112 patients with BA were enrolled, including 80 patients with acute attack (range: 2-86 years old, mean: 53.89±17.306 years old, males of 33) and 32 patients with non-acute attack (range: 4-79 years old, mean: 57.38±19.223 years old, males of 18). A total of 10 imaging features are finally retained and used to construct model using multi-factor logical regression method. In the training group, the AUC, sensitivity and specificity of the model was 0.881 (95% CI:0.808-0.955), 0.804 and 0.818, separately; while in the test group, it was 0.792 (95% CI:0.608-0.976), 0.792 and 0.80, respectively. Conclusion: The model constructed based on radiomics has a good effect on predicting the staging of patients with BA, which provides a new method for clinical diagnosis of staging in BA patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.