Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38562231›Full record

ArticleThrombosis update2023

Pulmonary embolism in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

Inge H Y Luu, Jacqueline Buijs, Jasenko Krdzalic, Martijn D de Kruif, Guy J M Mostard, Hugo Ten Cate, Tom P J Dormans, Remy L M Mostard, Math P G Leers, Daan J L van Twist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thrombosis update, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Inge H Y LuuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Centre, PO-box 5500, 6130, MB, Sittard, the Netherlands.
Jacqueline BuijsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Centre, PO-box 5500, 6130, MB, Sittard, the Netherlands.
Jasenko KrdzalicDepartment of Radiology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, PO-box 5500, 6130, MB, Sittard, the Netherlands.
Martijn D de KruifDepartment of Pulmonology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, PO-box 5500, 6130, MB, Sittard, the Netherlands.
Guy J M MostardDepartment of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Centre, PO-box 5500, 6130, MB, Sittard, the Netherlands.
Hugo Ten CateDepartment of Internal Medicine and Biochemistry, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO-box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Tom P J DormansDepartment of Intensive Care, Zuyderland Medical Centre, PO-box 5500, 6130, MB, Sittard, the Netherlands.
Remy L M MostardDepartment of Pulmonology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, PO-box 5500, 6130, MB, Sittard, the Netherlands.
Math P G LeersDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, PO-box 5500, 6130, MB, Sittard, the Netherlands.
Daan J L van TwistDepartment of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Centre, PO-box 5500, 6130, MB, Sittard, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a frequent complication in COVID-19. However, the influence of PE on the prognosis of COVID-19 remains unclear as previous studies were affected by misclassification bias. Therefore, we evaluated a cohort of COVID-19 patients whom all underwent systematic screening for PE (thereby avoiding misclassification) and compared clinical outcomes between patients with and without PE. Materials and methods: We included all COVID-19 patients who were admitted through the ED between April 2020 and February 2021. All patients underwent systematic work-up for PE in the ED using the YEARS-algorithm. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality and ICU admission. We also evaluated long-term outcomes including PE occurrence within 90 days after discharge and one-year all-cause mortality. Results: 637 ED patients were included in the analysis. PE was diagnosed in 46 of them (7.2%). The occurrence of the primary outcome did not differ between patients with PE and those without (28.3% vs. 26.9%, Conclusions: In a cohort of COVID-19 patients who underwent systematic PE screening in the ED, we found no differences in mortality rate and ICU admissions between patients with and without PE. This may indicate that proactive PE screening, and thus timely diagnosis and treatment of PE, may limit further clinical deterioration and associated mortality in COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

Clinical outcomesCOVID-19Pulmonary embolism

Identifiers

PMID38562231
PMCPMC10286522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.