Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38562217›Full record

ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2024

Monowave vs. Polywave Light - Curing Units: Effect on Light Transmission of Composite without Alternative Photoinitiators.

Danijela Marović, Paulina Daničić, Gloria Bojo, Matej Par, Zrinka Tarle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danijela MarovićDepartment of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3104-5749
Paulina DaničićStudent of the University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9102-9848
Gloria BojoStudent of the University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3178-4121
Matej ParDepartment of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2846-1840
Zrinka TarleDepartment of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7096-4575

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the light transmission of monowave and polywave-curing devices by a bulk-fill composite containing only camphorquinone as a photoinitiator. Materials and methods: Three light-curing devices were used to cure bulk-fill composite QuiXfil: one monowave (Translux® Wave) and two polywave (VALO Cordless and Bluephase® PowerCure. The NIST-calibrated spectrometer (MARC Resin Calibrator, BlueLight Analytics Inc.) was used to measure the incident and transmitted light through a 2-mm composite specimen over 20 s. Light transmittance was calculated from the ratio of the amount of transmitted and incident light. For data analysis (ANOVA, α = 0.05), total irradiation of the entire spectrum, irradiation with wavelengths of 360-420 nm for the violet spectrum, and 420-540 nm for the blue spectrum were selected. Results: Monowave curing unit Translux® Wave had the lowest light transmission (13.78 ± 0.5%), similar to the violet light transmission of polywave devices (12.02 ± 0.94% and 13.81 ± 1.72% for Valo Cordless and Bluephase PowerCure, respectively). Blue light transmittance (32.15-23.70%) was more than twofold higher than for the wavelengths in the violet region of the spectrum (13.81-12.02%) for the two polywave devices. VALO Cordless showed the highest total and blue light transmission (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the transmission of the violet part of the spectrum between VALO Cordless and Bluephase® PowerCure (p = 0.465). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, we could conclude that polywave curing devices can be used for the polymerization of the bulk-fill composite with camphorquinone as the sole photoinitiator.

Indexed as

Dental Curing LightsDental PhotoinitiatorsLight-curing unitsLight transmissionMeSH Terms: Composite ResinsMonowavephotoinitiatorPolywave

Identifiers

PMID38562217
PMCPMC10981906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.