ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Oral rehabilitation and associated quality of life following mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Finite Element Analysis of Ultra-Short, Extra-Short, and Conventional Dental Implants in Fibula Free Flap Mandibular Reconstruction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dental implant rehabilitation after jaw tumor resection: a mini-review of protocols and quality of life across treatment modalities.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Dental Rehabilitation After Bone Mandibular Reconstruction for Head and Neck Cancer: A GETTEC Multicenter Study.Head & neck · 2026Article
- Restoring Mandibular Anatomy After Complex Trauma: Clinical Applications of a Statistical Shape Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Long term dental implant survival and bone level changes with special emphasis on radiation therapy after free fibula flap reconstruction - a retrospective study.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Optimizing Recovery in Oral Flap Surgeries: The Undervalued Role of Physiotherapy.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2025Article
- Hypothyroidism following immunotherapy predicts more postoperative complication in oral squamous cell carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Enhancing Implant Success in Mandibular Reconstruction: A Novel Approach Combining Implant-Retained Splint and Vestibuloplasty-A Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Peri-Implant Health and Perfusion Parameters in Patients After Microvascular Jaw Reconstruction: A Clinical Cohort Study.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2025Article
- Clinical Comparison of CAD/CAM vs. KLS L1Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Oncologic outcomes following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Functional outcomes and quality of life following free fibula flap harvest: a comparative analysis of flexor hallucis longus resection versus preservation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Relationship between fibula free flap complications and dental implant outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
- Mandibular Reconstruction with Osseous Free Flap and Immediate Prosthetic Rehabilitation (Jaw-in-a-Day): In-House Manufactured Innovative Modular Stackable Guide System.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Finite element biomechanical comparison of bone-driven and occlusion-driven fibular flap positioning in lateral segmental mandibular reconstruction.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mandibular reconstruction with the free fibula flap (FFF) has become a standardized procedure. The situation is different with oral rehabilitation, so the purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency of implant placement and prosthetic restoration. Additionally, the patients' situation, motivation, and treatment course were structurally assessed. Materials and methods: All cases between January 2013 and December 2018 that underwent mandibular reconstruction in our department with a free fibula flap and gave written informed consent to participate were interviewed with two structured questionnaires about their restoration and quality of life. Additionally, medical records, general information, status of implants and therapy, and metric analyses of the inserted implants were performed. Results: In total 59 patients were enrolled and analyzed in this monocentric study. Overall, oral rehabilitation was achieved in 23.7% at the time of investigation. In detail, implants were inserted in 37.3% of patients and showed an 83.3% survival of dental implants. Of these implanted patients, dental implants were successfully restored with a prosthetic restoration in 63.6. Within this subgroup, satisfaction with the postoperative aesthetic and functional result was 79.9% and with the oral rehabilitation process was 68.2%. Satisfaction with the implant-borne prosthesis was 87.5%, with non-oral-squamous-cell-carcinoma patients being statistically significantly more content with the handling ( Discussion: Despite the well-reconstructed bony structures, there is a need to increase the effort of achieving oral rehabilitation, especially looking at the patient's persistent motivation for the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.