Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38562168›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Oral rehabilitation and associated quality of life following mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap: a cross-sectional study.

Lucas M Ritschl, Hannes Singer, Franz-Carl Clasen, Bernhard Haller, Andreas M Fichter, Herbert Deppe, Klaus-Dietrich Wolff, Jochen Weitz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clinical Comparison of CAD/CAM vs. KLS L1Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucas M RitschlDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Hannes SingerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Franz-Carl ClasenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Bernhard HallerInstitute of AI and Informatics in Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Andreas M FichterDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Herbert DeppeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Klaus-Dietrich WolffDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Jochen WeitzDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Mandibular reconstruction with the free fibula flap (FFF) has become a standardized procedure. The situation is different with oral rehabilitation, so the purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency of implant placement and prosthetic restoration. Additionally, the patients' situation, motivation, and treatment course were structurally assessed. Materials and methods: All cases between January 2013 and December 2018 that underwent mandibular reconstruction in our department with a free fibula flap and gave written informed consent to participate were interviewed with two structured questionnaires about their restoration and quality of life. Additionally, medical records, general information, status of implants and therapy, and metric analyses of the inserted implants were performed. Results: In total 59 patients were enrolled and analyzed in this monocentric study. Overall, oral rehabilitation was achieved in 23.7% at the time of investigation. In detail, implants were inserted in 37.3% of patients and showed an 83.3% survival of dental implants. Of these implanted patients, dental implants were successfully restored with a prosthetic restoration in 63.6. Within this subgroup, satisfaction with the postoperative aesthetic and functional result was 79.9% and with the oral rehabilitation process was 68.2%. Satisfaction with the implant-borne prosthesis was 87.5%, with non-oral-squamous-cell-carcinoma patients being statistically significantly more content with the handling ( Discussion: Despite the well-reconstructed bony structures, there is a need to increase the effort of achieving oral rehabilitation, especially looking at the patient's persistent motivation for the procedure.

Indexed as

dental implantsfree fibula flapmandibular reconstructionoral rehabilitationquality of life

Identifiers

PMID38562168
PMCPMC10982308
OpenAlexW4392923679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.