Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38562164›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2024

Budget impact of the Walk With Ease program for knee osteoarthritis.

Mahima T Kumara, Rebecca J Cleveland, Aleksandra M Kostic, Serena E Weisner, Kelli D Allen, Yvonne M Golightly, Heather Welch, Melissa Dale, Stephen P Messier, David J Hunter and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mahima T KumaraPolicy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Rebecca J ClevelandThurston Arthritis Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Aleksandra M KosticPolicy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Serena E WeisnerThurston Arthritis Research Center, Osteoarthritis Action Alliance, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kelli D AllenDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Yvonne M GolightlyCollege of Allied Health Professions, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Heather WelchMontana Department of Public Health and Human Services, Helena, MT, USA.
Melissa DaleMontana Department of Public Health and Human Services, Helena, MT, USA.
Stephen P MessierDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Salem, NC, USA.
David J HunterSydney Musculoskeletal Health, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney and Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Jeffrey N KatzPolicy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Leigh F CallahanThurston Arthritis Research Center, Departments of Medicine and Orthopaedics, Osteoarthritis Action Alliance, Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Elena LosinaPolicy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Walk With Ease (WWE) is an effective low-cost walking program. We estimated the budget impact of implementing WWE in persons with knee osteoarthritis (OA) as a measure of affordability that can inform payers' funding decisions. Methods: We estimated changes in two-year healthcare costs with and without WWE. We used the Osteoarthritis Policy (OAPol) Model to estimate per-person medical expenditures. We estimated total and per-member-per-month (PMPM) costs of funding WWE for a hypothetical insurance plan with 75,000 members under two conditions: 1) all individuals aged 45+ with knee OA eligible for WWE, and 2) inactive and insufficiently active individuals aged 45+ with knee OA eligible. In sensitivity analyses, we varied WWE cost and efficacy and considered productivity costs. Results: With eligibility unrestricted by activity level, implementing WWE results in an additional $1,002,408 to the insurance plan over two years ($0.56 PMPM). With eligibility restricted to inactive and insufficiently active individuals, funding WWE results in an additional $571,931 over two years ($0.32 PMPM). In sensitivity analyses, when per-person costs of $10 to $1000 were added with 10-50% decreases in failure rate (enhanced sustainability of WWE benefits), two-year budget impact varied from $242,684 to $6,985,674 with unrestricted eligibility and from -$43,194 (cost-saving) to $4,484,122 with restricted eligibility. Conclusion: Along with the cost-effectiveness of WWE at widely accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds, these results can inform payers in deciding to fund WWE. In the absence of accepted thresholds to define affordability, these results can assist in comparing the affordability of WWE with other behavioral interventions.

Indexed as

Budget impact analysisExerciseKnee osteoarthritisPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID38562164
PMCPMC10982564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.