ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Clinical value of TAT, PIC and t-PAIC as predictive markers for severe sepsis in pediatric patients.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- TM and t-PAIC may be possible biomarkers to predict postoperative infection after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Observational
- Role of biomarkers in pediatric sepsis: What evidence says?World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Review
- Targeting hemostatic enzymes: from mechanistic insights to therapeutic frontiers.Current opinion in hematology · 2025Review
- Coagulation and Inflammatory Indicators in Pneumonia Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Propensity-Score Matching Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Study on the Predictive Value of MASP-1 Combined with Four Thrombotic Molecular Markers for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Patients with Severe Infection.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Risk Factors for Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Coagulation Abnormalities: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Current medical science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Sepsis in pediatric patients can progress to severe sepsis, and identifying biomarkers of this progression may permit timely intervention to prevent it. This study aimed to investigate the ability of thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), α2-plasmininhibitor-plasmin complex (PIC) and tissue-type plasminogen activator-inhibitor complex (t-PAIC) to predict severe sepsis in pediatrics early. Methods: 148 eligible pediatric sepsis patients were enrolled in this study, and were then divided into those who progressed to severe sepsis ( Results: Compared with sepsis patients, severe sepsis patients had higher levels of TAT, PIC and t-PAIC. Correlation analysis revealed that TAT, PIC and t-PAIC were significantly correlated with simplified PCIS and DIC score. ROC curve analysis suggested that TAT, PIC and t-PAIC could serve as biomarkers for predicting severe sepsis with the AUC up to 0.862, 0.759 and 0.851, respectively. Stratified analysis demonstrated that the patients with increased levels of TAT, PIC and t-PAIC had worse illness severity and clinical outcome. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that TAT, PIC and t-PAIC were all risk factors for severe sepsis, yet only TAT and t-PAIC were independent risk factors in multivariate model. Conclusions: TAT, PIC and t-PAIC could serve as biomarkers for predicting severe sepsis, and correlated with illness severity in pediatrics, what's more, serum levels of TAT and t-PAIC may be independent risk factors for pediatric severe sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.