Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38562033›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2024

Cyclic loading failed to promote growth in a pig model of midfacial hypoplasia.

Susan W Herring, Katherine L Rafferty, David U Shin, Kelsey Smith, Michael C Baldwin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan W HerringDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6189-0014
Katherine L RaffertyDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
David U ShinDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kelsey SmithDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Michael C BaldwinDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Comprehensive Training in Inter-Disciplinary Oral Health ResearchT90DE021984 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Robert Aaron Cornell · 2012 to 2026
$7.9M
Suture Mechanobiology and the Vasculature: A New Approach to Midfacial HypoplasiaR21DE024814 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HERRING, SUSAN W · 2016 to 2017
$425k
Causes and Consequences of Midfacial Hypoplasia in the Yucatan MinipigF30DE028183 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BALDWIN, MICHAEL C · 2019 to 2021
$119k
Douglas L. Morrell Research FundNIDCR NIH HHS F30 DE028183NIDCR NIH HHS F30DE028183NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE024814NIDCR NIH HHS R21DE024814NIDCR NIH HHS T90 DE021984NIDCR NIH HHS T90DE021984University of Washington Orthodontic Alumni Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yucatan miniature pigs, often used as large animal models in clinical research, are distinguished by a breed-specific midfacial hypoplasia with anterior crossbite. Although this deformity can be corrected by distraction osteogenesis, a less invasive method is desirable. We chose a mechanical cyclic stimulation protocol that has been successful in enhancing sutural growth in small animals and in a pilot study on standard pigs. Yucatan minipigs (n = 14) were obtained in pairs, with one of each pair randomly assigned to sham or loaded groups. All animals had loading implants installed on the right nasal and frontal bones and received labels for cell proliferation and mineral apposition. After a week of healing and under anesthesia, experimental animals received cyclic tensile loads (2.5 Hz, 30 min) delivered to the right nasofrontal suture daily for 5 days. Sutural strains were recorded at the final session for experimental animals. Sham animals received the same treatment except without loading or strain gauge placement. In contrast to pilot results on standard pigs, the treatment did not produce the expected sutural widening and increased growth. Although sutures were not fused and strains were in the normal range, the targeted right nasofrontal suture was narrowed rather than widened, with no statistically significant changes in sutural cell proliferation, mineral apposition, or vascularity. In general, Yucatan minipig sutures were more vascular than those of standard pigs and also tended to have more proliferating cells. In conclusion, either because the sutures themselves are abnormal or because of growth restrictions elsewhere in the skull, this cyclic loading protocol was unable to produce the desired response of sutural widening and growth. This treatment, effective in normal animals, did not improve naturally occurring midfacial hypoplasia in Yucatan minipigs.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalSwine, MiniatureAnimalsCranial SuturesOsteogenesis, DistractionSwinecraniofacial suturecyclic loadingmidfacial hypoplasiapigskull growth

Identifiers

PMID38562033
PMCPMC11442677
OpenAlexW4393497118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.