Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38562017›Full record

ArticleJournal of biopharmaceutical statistics2024

Covariate adjusted meta-analytic predictive (CA-MAP) prior for historical borrowing using patient-level data.

Bradley Hupf, Yunlong Yang, Ryan Gryder, Veronica Bunn, Jianchang Lin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bradley HupfTakeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Yunlong YangDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Ryan GryderTakeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Veronica BunnTakeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Jianchang LinTakeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Takeda (United States) · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Utilization of historical data is increasingly common for gaining efficiency in the drug development and decision-making processes. The underlying issue of between-trial heterogeneity in clinical trials is a barrier in making these methods standard practice in the pharmaceutical industry. Common methods for historical borrowing discount the borrowed information based on the similarity between outcomes in the historical and current data. However, individual clinical trials and their outcomes are intrinsically heterogenous due to differences in study design, patient characteristics, and changes in standard of care. Additionally, differences in covariate distributions can produce inconsistencies in clinical outcome data between historical and current data when there may be a consistent covariate effect. In such scenario, borrowing historical data is still advantageous even though the population level outcome summaries are different. In this paper, we propose a covariate adjusted meta-analytic-predictive (CA-MAP) prior for historical control borrowing. A MAP prior is assigned to each covariate effect, allowing the amount of borrowing to be determined by the consistency of the covariate effects across the current and historical data. This approach integrates between-trial heterogeneity with covariate level heterogeneity to tune the amount of information borrowed. Our method is unique as it directly models the covariate effects instead of using the covariates to select a similar population to borrow from. In summary, our proposed patient-level extension of the MAP prior allows for the amount of historical control borrowing to depend on the similarity of covariate effects rather than similarity in clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicClinical Trials as TopicComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalDrug DevelopmentHumansModels, StatisticalResearch DesignCovariate adjustedhistorical data borrowingmeta-analytic-predictivepatient level data

Identifiers

PMID38562017
OpenAlexW4393486085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.