Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38561864›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and prognostic research2024

Critical appraisal of machine learning prognostic models for acute pancreatitis: protocol for a systematic review.

Amier Hassan, Brian Critelli, Ila Lahooti, Ali Lahooti, Nate Matzko, Jan Niklas Adams, Lukas Liss, Justin Quion, David Restrepo, Melica Nikahd and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and prognostic research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Amier Hassan *Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA.
Brian Critelli *Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA.
Ila LahootiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Ali LahootiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA.
Nate MatzkoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA.
Jan Niklas AdamsDivision of Process and Data Science, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Lukas LissDivision of Process and Data Science, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Justin QuionLaboratory for Computational Physiology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.
David RestrepoLaboratory for Computational Physiology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.
Melica NikahdDivision of Bioinformatics, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Stacey CulpDivision of Bioinformatics, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Lydia NohNortheast Ohio Medical School, Rootstown, USA.
Kathleen TongDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jun Sung ParkDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Venkata AkshintalaDivision of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, USA.
John A WindsorDepartment of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nikhil K MullDivision of Hospital Medicine and Penn Medicine Center for Evidence-based Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Georgios I PapachristouDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Leo Anthony CeliDepartment of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Peter J LeeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA. Peter.Lee@osumc.edu.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USCornell University · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USRWTH Aachen University · DEJohns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center · USMount Sinai Beth Israel · USNortheast Ohio Medical University · USUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Pennsylvania Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an acute inflammatory disorder that is common, costly, and is increasing in incidence worldwide with over 300,000 hospitalizations occurring yearly in the United States alone. As its course and outcomes vary widely, a critical knowledge gap in the field has been a lack of accurate prognostic tools to forecast AP patients' outcomes. Despite several published studies in the last three decades, the predictive performance of published prognostic models has been found to be suboptimal. Recently, non-regression machine learning models (ML) have garnered intense interest in medicine for their potential for better predictive performance. Each year, an increasing number of AP models are being published. However, their methodologic quality relating to transparent reporting and risk of bias in study design has never been systematically appraised. Therefore, through collaboration between a group of clinicians and data scientists with appropriate content expertise, we will perform a systematic review of papers published between January 2021 and December 2023 containing artificial intelligence prognostic models in AP. To systematically assess these studies, the authors will leverage the CHARMS checklist, PROBAST tool for risk of bias assessment, and the most current version of the TRIPOD-AI. (Research Registry ( http://www.reviewregistry1727 .).

Identifiers

PMID38561864
PMCPMC10986113
OpenAlexW4393393189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.