Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38561743›Full record

ReviewCell division2024

CIP/KIP and INK4 families as hostages of oncogenic signaling.

Lucia Csergeová, David Krbušek, Radoslav Janoštiak

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell division, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Unusual inheritance of a functionalScience advances · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. p27Cells · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucia Csergeová *BIOCEV-First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
David Krbušek *BIOCEV-First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Radoslav JanoštiakBIOCEV-First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia. radoslav.janostiak@lf1.cuni.cz.
Charles University · CZ

Funding

European Union - Next Generation EU, Programme EXCELES National Institute for Cancer Research #LX22NPO5102Univerzita Karlova v Praze PRIMUS/22/MED/007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CIP/KIP and INK4 families of Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs) are well-established cell cycle regulatory proteins whose canonical function is binding to Cyclin-CDK complexes and altering their function. Initial experiments showed that these proteins negatively regulate cell cycle progression and thus are tumor suppressors in the context of molecular oncology. However, expanded research into the functions of these proteins showed that most of them have non-canonical functions, both cell cycle-dependent and independent, and can even act as tumor enhancers depending on their posttranslational modifications, subcellular localization, and cell state context. This review aims to provide an overview of canonical as well as non-canonical functions of CIP/KIP and INK4 families of CKIs, discuss the potential avenues to promote their tumor suppressor functions instead of tumor enhancing ones, and how they could be utilized to design improved treatment regimens for cancer patients.

Indexed as

CancerCIP/KIPCyclin-dependent kinase inhibitorsINK4Oncogenic signalingPosttranslational modificationTherapy

Identifiers

PMID38561743
PMCPMC10985988
OpenAlexW4393376235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.