Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38561724›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Effectiveness of workplace choice architecture modification for healthy eating and daily physical activity.

Eeva Rantala, Saara Vanhatalo, Mikko Valtanen, Jaana Lindström, Jussi Pihlajamäki, Kaisa Poutanen, Pilvikki Absetz, Leila Karhunen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Eeva RantalaInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, 70211, Kuopio, Finland. eeva.rantala@thl.fi.
Saara VanhataloVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 02044, Espoo, Finland.
Mikko ValtanenFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Jaana LindströmFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Jussi PihlajamäkiInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, 70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Kaisa PoutanenVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 02044, Espoo, Finland.
Pilvikki Absetz *Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, 33520, Tampere, Finland.
Leila Karhunen *Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, 70211, Kuopio, Finland.
University of Eastern Finland · FIVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland · FIFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FITampere University · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModifying the choice architecture of behavioural contexts can facilitate health behaviour change, but existing evidence builds mostly on small-scale interventions limited in duration, targets, strategies, and settings. We evaluated the effectiveness of a one-year hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness trial aimed at promoting healthy eating and daily physical activity with subtle modifications to the choice architecture of heterogeneous worksites. The intervention was contextualised to and integrated into the routine operations of each worksite. Effectiveness was evaluated in a quasi-experimental pre-post design.

methodsIntervention sites (n = 21) implemented a median of two (range 1-9) intervention strategies for healthy eating and one (range 1-5) for physical activity. Questionnaires pre (n = 1126) and post (n = 943) intervention surveyed employees' behavioural patterns at work (food consumption: vegetables/roots, fruit/berries, nuts/almonds/seeds, sweet treats, fast food, water; physical activity: restorative movement, exercise equipment use, stair use). The post-intervention questionnaire also measured employees' perception of and response to three intervention strategies: a packed lunch recipe campaign, a fruit crew-strategy, and movement prompts. Multi- and single-level regression models evaluated effectiveness, treating intervention as a continuous predictor formed of the site-specific dose (n intervention strategies employed) and mean quality (three-point rating per strategy halfway and at the end of the intervention) of implementation relevant to each outcome.

resultsMultinomial logistic regression models found the intervention significantly associated with a favourable change in employees' fruit and berry consumption (interaction effect of time and implementation p = 0.006) and with an unfavourable change in sweet treat consumption (p = 0.048). The evidence was strongest for the finding concerning fruit/berry consumption-an outcome that sites with greater dose and quality of implementation targeted by using strategies that reduced the physical effort required to have fruit/berries at work and by covering multiple eating-related contexts at the worksite. The quality of implementation was positively associated with the perception of (p = 0.044) and response to (p = 0.017) the packed lunch recipes, and with response to the fruit crew-strategy (p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe results suggest that a contextualised, multicomponent choice architecture intervention can positively influence eating behaviour in diverse real-world settings over a one-year period, and that higher implementation quality can enhance intervention perception and response. However, outcomes may depend on the type of intervention strategies used and the extent of their delivery.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyHealth PromotionExerciseFruitHealth BehaviorHumansWorkplaceBehaviour changeChoice architectureDietHealth promotionNudgePhysical activityPreventionType 2 diabetesWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID38561724
PMCPMC10986070
OpenAlexW4393381980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.