ArticleBMC pediatrics2024
Next-generation sequencing based newborn screening and comparative analysis with MS/MS.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Second-Tier Whole Exome Sequencing Following Abnormal Newborn Screening: Diagnostic Yield, Secondary Findings, and Carrier Burden in a Taiwanese Neonatal Cohort.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Emerging Quantitative Targeted Metabolomics Approaches for Future Inborn Errors of Metabolism Screening.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Newborn Screening in Saudi Arabia: Brief History, Current Practice, and Future Direction.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Review
- Transformative Applications and Innovations in Next-Generation Sequencing Data Analysis.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Review
- Multiplexable, High-Throughput DNA-Based Technologies in Screening and Confirmatory Testing of Newborn Conditions: A Scoping Review.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025Review
- Newborn screening for fatty acid oxidation disorders: epidemiological and genetic findings in Southeastern China.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Amplicon-based targeted next-generation sequencing using dried blood spots for 46,XY differences/disorders of sex development: Aiming for diagnosis by minimally invasive testing.Clinical pediatric endocrinology : case reports and clinical investigations : official journal of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology · 2025Article
- Channel selection of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in infants pathogen detection: a multicenter cross-sectional study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Tandem mass spectrometry in screening for inborn errors of metabolism: comprehensive bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNewborn screening (NBS), such as tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), may yield false positive/negative results. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has the potential to provide increased data output, efficiencies, and applications. This study aimed to analyze the types and distribution of pathogenic gene mutations in newborns in Huzhou, Zhejiang province, China and explore the applicability of NGS and MS/MS in NBS.
methodsBlood spot samples from 1263 newborns were collected. NGS was employed to screen for pathogenic variants in 542 disease-causing genes, and detected variants were validated using Sanger sequencing. Simultaneously, 26 inherited metabolic diseases (IMD) were screened using MS/MS. Positive or suspicious samples identified through MS/MS were cross-referenced with the results of NGS.
resultsAmong all newborns, 328 had no gene mutations detected. NGS revealed at least one gene mutation in 935 newborns, with a mutation rate of 74.0%. The top 5 genes were FLG, GJB2, UGT1A1, USH2A, and DUOX2. According to American College of Medical Genetics guidelines, gene mutations in 260 cases were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutation, with a positive rate of 20.6%. The top 5 genes were UGT1A1, FLG, GJB2, MEFV, and G6PD. MS/MS identified 18 positive or suspicious samples for IMD and 1245 negative samples. Verification of these cases by NGS results showed no pathogenic mutations, resulting in a false positive rate of 1.4% (18/1263).
conclusionNBS using NGS technology broadened the range of diseases screened, and enhanced the accuracy of diagnoses in comparison to MS/MS for screening IMD. Combining NGS and biochemical screening would improve the efficiency of current NBS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.