ReviewCurrent protein & peptide science2024
A Review of the Common Neurodegenerative Disorders: Current Therapeutic Approaches and the Potential Role of Bioactive Peptides.
Review in Current protein & peptide science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discovery of tricyclic benzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-RSC advances · 2026Article
- Bibliometric analysis of nanomaterials in the diagnosis and treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders (1997-2025): trends and future directions.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- LASSO-HHO two-stage hybrid gene selection framework for accurate Alzheimer's disease diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Therapies Applied in Neurological Diseases: A Systematic Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Zebrafish as a translational model for peptide-mediated synaptic dysfunction related to obesity.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2026Review
- The Therapeutic Potential of Dietary Phytochemicals in Age-Related Neurodegenerative Disorders.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and neurodegeneration: mechanistic insights into oxidative stress, inflammation, and neuronal survival pathways.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Stem cell therapy use in patients with dementia: a systematic review.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Review
- Application of Network Pharmacology in the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases with Traditional Chinese Medicine.Planta medica · 2025Review
- Meroterpenoids from Terrestrial and Marine Fungi: Promising Agents for Neurodegenerative Disorders-An Updated Review.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Neural Networks of Knowledge: Ontologies Pioneering Precision Medicine in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Current neuropharmacology · 2025Review
- Nanoparticles: a new frontier in neurodegenerative disease therapy.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Review
- Impact of Peptide Transport and Memory Function in the Brain.Nutrients · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurodegenerative disorders, which include Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), Huntington's disease (HD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), represent a significant and growing global health challenge. Current therapies predominantly focus on symptom management rather than altering disease progression. In this review, we discuss the major therapeutic strategies in practice for these disorders, highlighting their limitations. For AD, the mainstay treatments are cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists. For PD, dopamine replacement therapies, including levodopa, are commonly used. HD is managed primarily with symptomatic treatments, and reusable extends survival in ALS. However, none of these therapies halts or substantially slows the neurodegenerative process. In contrast, this review highlights emerging research into bioactive peptides as potential therapeutic agents. These naturally occurring or synthetically designed molecules can interact with specific cellular targets, potentially modulating disease processes. Preclinical studies suggest that bioactive peptides may mitigate oxidative stress, inflammation, and protein misfolding, which are common pathological features in neurodegenerative diseases. Clinical trials using bioactive peptides for neurodegeneration are limited but show promising initial results. For instance, hemiacetal, a γ-secretase inhibitor peptide, has shown potential in AD by reducing amyloid-beta production, though its development was discontinued due to side effects. Despite these advancements, many challenges remain, including identifying optimal peptides, confirming their mechanisms of action, and overcoming obstacles related to their delivery to the brain. Future research should prioritize the discovery and development of novel bioactive peptides and improve our understanding of their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Ultimately, this approach may lead to more effective therapies for neurodegenerative disorders, moving beyond symptom management to potentially modify the course of these devastating diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.