Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38561581›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical research2024

Antibiotic Development: Lessons from the Past and Future Opportunities.

Michael S Kinch, Zachary Kraft, Tyler Schwartz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael S KinchCenter for Research Innovation in Biotechnology, Long Island University, Brookville, NY, 11548, USA. michael.kinch@liu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3939-3756
Zachary KraftCenter for Research Innovation in Biotechnology, Long Island University, Brookville, NY, 11548, USA.
Tyler SchwartzCenter for Research Innovation in Biotechnology, Long Island University, Brookville, NY, 11548, USA.
Long Island University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The challenge of antimicrobial resistance is broadly appreciated by the clinical and scientific communities. To assess progress in the development of medical countermeasures to combat bacterial infections, we deployed information gleaned from clinical trials conducted from 2000 to 2021. Whereas private sector interest in cancer grew dramatically over this period, activity to combat bacterial infections remained stagnant. The comparative ambivalence to antimicrobial resistance is reflected in the number of investigative drugs under clinical investigation, their stage of development and most troublingly, a declining number of organizations that are actively involved in the development of new products to treat bacterial infections. This drop reflects the exits of many companies that had previously developed antibacterial agents.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsDrug DevelopmentAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicDrug DiscoveryDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibioticsantimicrobial resistancebacterial infectionsclinical trials

Identifiers

PMID38561581
OpenAlexW4393392671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.