Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38561361›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

Comparison of efficacy and safety of equivalent doses of remimazolam versus propofol for gastroscopy anesthesia in elderly patients.

Di Chen, Min Liao, Xiao-Ru Wu, Tang-Yuan-Meng Zhao, Hu Sun

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Hemodynamic safety of remimazolamWorld journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Di Chen *The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Min Liao *The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Xiao-Ru WuThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Tang-Yuan-Meng Zhao *West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Hu SunThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China. sunhu09@163.com.
Hainan Medical University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remimazolam, a novel intravenous anesthetic, has been proven to be safe and efficacious in the gastroscopy setting among the elderly. However, reports comparing the effectiveness and safety of using equivalent doses of remimazolam with propofol have not been seen. The aim of this study was to compare the sedation efficacy and safety of the 95% effective doses (ED

Indexed as

AnesthesiaPropofolAgedBenzodiazepinesGastroscopyHumansSufentanilBenzodiazepinesPropofolremimazolamSufentanilEffective doseElderly patientsGastroscopyPropofolRemimazolam

Identifiers

PMID38561361
PMCPMC10984999
OpenAlexW4393388646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.