Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38561315›Full record

ArticleMolecular plant pathology2024

Functional screening of the Arabidopsis 2C protein phosphatases family identifies PP2C15 as a negative regulator of plant immunity by targeting BRI1-associated receptor kinase 1.

Zhihong Diao, Rongqian Yang, Yizhu Wang, Junmei Cui, Junhao Li, Qiqi Wu, Yaxin Zhang, Xiaosong Yu, Benqiang Gong, Yan Huang and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular plant pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhihong DiaoDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Biology, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0009-0005-6172-4269
Rongqian YangDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Biology, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Yizhu WangDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Biology, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Junmei CuiDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Biology, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Junhao LiDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Biology, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Qiqi WuChengdu Lusyno Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China.
Yaxin ZhangChengdu Lusyno Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China.
Xiaosong YuDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Biology, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Benqiang GongGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, MOE Key Laboratory of Gene Function and Regulation, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yan HuangDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Biology, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5226-2390
Guozhi YuDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Biology, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Huipeng YaoDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Biology, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Jinya GuoDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Biology, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Huaiyu ZhangDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Biology, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Jinbo ShenZhejiang A&F University State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, School of Forestry and Biotechnology, Zhejiang A&F University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.
Andrea A GustDepartment of the Centre for Plant Molecular Biology, Plant Biochemistry, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Yi CaiDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Biology, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Sichuan Agricultural University · CNChengdu Organic Chemicals (China) · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of Tübingen · DEZhejiang A & F University · CN

Funding

Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau, Sichuan, China 2020-RC02-00060-CGNational Natural Science Foundation of China 31971940Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province, China 2022NSFSC1704The Henry Fok Foundation 151104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic engineering using negative regulators of plant immunity has the potential to provide a huge impetus in agricultural biotechnology to achieve a higher degree of disease resistance without reducing yield. Type 2C protein phosphatases (PP2Cs) represent the largest group of protein phosphatases in plants, with a high potential for negative regulatory functions by blocking the transmission of defence signals through dephosphorylation. Here, we established a PP2C functional protoplast screen using pFRK1::luciferase as a reporter and found that 14 of 56 PP2Cs significantly inhibited the immune response induced by flg22. To verify the reliability of the system, a previously reported MAPK3/4/6-interacting protein phosphatase, PP2C5, was used; it was confirmed to be a negative regulator of PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI). We further identified PP2C15 as an interacting partner of BRI1-associated receptor kinase 1 (BAK1), which is the most well-known co-receptor of plasma membrane-localized pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), and a central component of PTI. PP2C15 dephosphorylates BAK1 and negatively regulates BAK1-mediated PTI responses such as MAPK3/4/6 activation, defence gene expression, reactive oxygen species bursts, stomatal immunity, callose deposition, and pathogen resistance. Although plant growth and 1000-seed weight of pp2c15 mutants were reduced compared to those of wild-type plants, pp2c5 mutants did not show any adverse effects. Thus, our findings strengthen the understanding of the mechanism by which PP2C family members negatively regulate plant immunity at multiple levels and indicate a possible approach to enhance plant resistance by eliminating specific PP2Cs without affecting plant growth and yield.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, PlantPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesPlant ImmunityProtein KinasesReproducibility of ResultsArabidopsis ProteinsBRI1 protein, ArabidopsisPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesProtein KinasesArabidopsisBAK1flg22PP2C15PP2C5

Identifiers

PMID38561315
PMCPMC10984862
OpenAlexW4393450196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.