Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38560897›Full record

ReviewStem cells translational medicine2024

Donor Muse Cell Treatment Without HLA-Matching Tests and Immunosuppressant Treatment.

Shinya Minatoguchi, Yasuyuki Fujita, Kuniyasu Niizuma, Teiji Tominaga, Toru Yamashita, Koji Abe, Mari Dezawa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Pluripotency genes of mammals: a network at work.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shinya MinatoguchiDepartment of Cardiology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan.
Yasuyuki FujitaDepartment of Dermatology, Sapporo City General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Kuniyasu NiizumaDepartment of Neurosurgical Engineering and Translational Neuroscience, Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Teiji TominagaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3411-2900
Toru YamashitaDepartment of Neurology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Koji AbeNational Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo.
Mari DezawaDepartment of Stem Cell Biology and Histology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9978-6178
Tohoku University · JPGifu Municipal Hospital · JPNational Center of Neurology and Psychiatry · JPOkayama University · JPSapporo City General Hospital · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and DevelopmentJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceLife Science Institute IncMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNew Energy and Industrial Technology Development OrganizationSENSHIN Medical Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The strength of stem cell therapy is the regeneration of tissues by synergistic pleiotropic effects. Among many stem cell types, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that are comprised of heterogenous population are widely used for clinical applications with the expectation of pleiotropic bystander effects. Muse cells are pluripotent-like/macrophage-like stem cells distributed in the bone marrow, peripheral blood, and organ connective tissues as cells positive for the pluripotent surface marker stage-specific-embryonic antigen -3. Muse cells comprise ~1% to several percent of MSCs. While Muse cells and MSCs share several characteristics, such as mesenchymal surface marker expression and their bystander effects, Muse cells exhibit unique characteristics not observed in MSCs. These unique characteristics of Muse cells include selective homing to damaged tissue after intravenous injection rather than being trapped in the lung like MSCs, replacement of a wide range of damaged/apoptotic cells by differentiation through phagocytosis, and long-lasting immunotolerance for donor cell use. In this review, we focus on the basic properties of Muse cells clarified through preclinical studies and clinical trials conducted by intravenous injection of donor-Muse cells without HLA-matching tests or immunosuppressant treatment. MSCs are considered to differentiate into osteogenic, chondrogenic, and adipogenic cells, whereas the range of their differentiation has long been debated. Muse cells may provide clues to the wide-ranging differentiation potential of MSCs that are observed with low frequency. Furthermore, the utilization of Muse cells may provide a novel strategy for clinical treatment.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsCell DifferentiationHistocompatibility TestingHLA AntigensHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationHLA AntigensImmunosuppressive Agentsamyotrophic lateral sclerosisepidermolysis bullosaimmunotoleranceintravenous injectionmyocardial infarctionpluripotentsphingosine-1-phosphatestroke

Identifiers

PMID38560897
PMCPMC11165166
OpenAlexW4393372016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.