Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38560789›Full record

ReviewThe neuroradiology journal2024

Current research status and future of endovascular treatment for basilar artery aneurysms.

Jinlu Yu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The neuroradiology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jinlu YuDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Jilin University, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2329-7946
Jilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aneurysms occurring along the basilar artery (BA) account for <1% of all intracranial aneurysms. Endovascular treatment (EVT) in particular is recommended for large unruptured BA aneurysms and ruptured BA aneurysms. Given that EVT techniques vary, a detailed review of EVT for BA aneurysms is necessary. In this review, the following issues were discussed: the anatomy and anomalies of the BA, the classification of BA aneurysms, the natural history of BA aneurysms, the status of open surgery, the use of EVT for various types of BA aneurysms and the deployment of new devices. According to the findings of this review and based on our experience in treating BA aneurysms, traditional coiling EVT is still the optimal therapy for most BA aneurysms. However, in some BA aneurysms, flow diverter (FD) deployment can be used. In addition, there are also some new devices, such as intrasaccular flow disruptors and stent-like devices that can be used to treat BA aneurysms. In general, EVT can yield good clinical and angiographic outcomes for patients with BA aneurysms. In addition, recent new devices and techniques, such as new-generation FDs generated via surface modification and virtual reality simulation techniques, show promise for EVT for BA aneurysms. These devices and techniques may further improve EVT outcomes for BA aneurysms.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmBasilar ArteryEmbolization, TherapeuticHumansStentsaneurysmbasilar arterycomplicationEndovascular treatmentprognosis

Identifiers

PMID38560789
PMCPMC11528780
OpenAlexW4393372219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.