Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38560756›Full record

ArticleACS physical chemistry Au2024

Hydration Waters Make Up for the Missing Third Hydrogen Bond in the A·T Base Pair.

Chi H Mak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS physical chemistry Au, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chi H MakDepartments of Chemistry and Quantitative and Computational Biology, and Center of Applied Mathematical Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5516-3304
University of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Base pairing complementarity is central to DNA function. G·C and A·T pair specificity is thought to originate from the different number of hydrogen bonds the pairs make. Quantifying how many hydrogen bonds exist can be difficult because water molecules in the surrounding can make up for or disrupt direct hydrogen bonds, and the hydration structures around A·T and G·C pairs on duplex DNA are distinct. Large-scale computer simulations have been used here to create a detailed map for the hydration structure on A·T and G·C base pairs in water. The contributions of specific hydration waters to the free energy of each of the hydrogen bonds in the A·T and G·C pairs were computed. Using the equilibrium fractions of hydrated versus unhydrated states from the hydration profiles, the impact of specific bound waters on each hydrogen bond can be uniquely quantified using a thermodynamic construction. The findings suggest that hydration water in the minor groove of an A·T pair can provide up to about 2 kcal/mol of free energy advantage, effectively making up for the missing third hydrogen bond in the A·T pair compared to G·C, rendering the intrinsic thermodynamic stability of the A·T pair almost synonymous with G·C.

Identifiers

PMID38560756
PMCPMC10979491
OpenAlexW4391187962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.