Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38560744›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine reports2024

Adaptation of the Serious Illness Conversation Guide to Singapore's Multicultural Setting for Patients With Heart Failure, Renal Failure, or Cancer.

Anna So Youn Lee, Swee Noi Tang, Gillian Li Gek Phua, Alethea Chung-Pheng Yee, Shirlyn Hui-Shan Neo

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07733973 (Evaluating the Effectiveness, Acceptability and Feasibility of a Communication and Care Coordinator), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07733973 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating the Effectiveness, Acceptability and Feasibility of a Communication and Care Coordinator (CCC) Model in Facilitating Serious Illness Communication (SIC) and Care in Patients With Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Centre, SingaporeRan2026 to 2029Enrolled560ConditionsCancerArmsCCC Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna So Youn LeeDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Swee Noi TangOffice of Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Singapore, Singapore.
Gillian Li Gek PhuaDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Alethea Chung-Pheng YeeOffice of Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Singapore, Singapore.
Shirlyn Hui-Shan NeoDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2811-1661

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG) was developed by Ariadne Labs in the United States. However, there is a scarcity of literature on the cross-cultural adaptations of the SICG in Asian settings. Objectives: We aimed to adapt the SICG for English-speaking patients with serious illnesses in Singapore. Methods: We purposively recruited 28 patients with advanced stages of heart failure, renal failure, or cancer from a tertiary hospital. A designated research team member conducted semistructured interviews to obtain participants' feedback on the SICG. The interviews were transcribed by the designated study team member. Participants' response to each item on the SICG was coded quantitatively into categories to denote participant acceptance, partial acceptance, or nonacceptance. Transcripts were further analyzed using content analysis to understand participants' rationale regarding feedback of the specific SICG item. Modifications to the SICG were iteratively made over time to obtain its current version. Results: Participants indicated a preference for direct language with shorter sentences and inclusive pronouns. It was considered important that clinicians keep the conversation hopeful, individualize the conversation content according to the patient's journey, and use prompts where necessary to support the patient's elaboration. Conclusion: This study outlined a patient-centric approach to localizing the SICG in the English language to a new cultural context, marking the first such effort in an Asian setting. Further study is under way to evaluate the SICG in more disease populations and non-English languages used in Singapore.

Indexed as

Asian populationscommunity-based palliative carecross-cultural issueshealth services researchhospital-specific palliative care issuesSerious Illness Conversation Guide

Identifiers

PMID38560744
PMCPMC10979657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.