ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Clinical course of five patients definitively diagnosed with idiopathic perilymphatic fistula treated with transcanal endoscopic ear surgery.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: An idiopathic perilymphatic fistula (PLF) can be difficult to diagnose because patients present with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) and/or vestibular symptoms without any preceding events. In such cases, we currently test for cochlin-tomoprotein (CTP) to confirm the diagnosis of idiopathic PLF because CTP is only detected in the perilymph. In this study, we report the clinical course of five patients definitively diagnosed with idiopathic PLF who underwent PLF repair surgery using transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES). Patients and methods: Five patients were initially treated with intratympanic dexamethasone for SSHL, at which time a CTP test was also performed (preoperative CTP test). Due to refractory hearing loss and/or fluctuating disequilibrium, PLF repair surgery using TEES was performed to seal the oval and round windows using connective tissue and fibrin glue. These patients were diagnosed with definite idiopathic PLF based on pre- or intra-operative CTP test results (negative, < 0.4 ng/mL; intermediate, 0.4-< 0.8 ng/mL; and positive, > 0.8 ng/mL). We evaluated pre- and intra-operative CTP values, intraoperative surgical findings via a magnified endoscopic view, and pre- and post-operative changes in averaged hearing level and vestibular symptoms. Results: Pre- and intra-operative CTP values were positive and intermediate in three patients, positive and negative in one patient, and negative and positive in one patient. None of the patients had intraoperative findings consistent with a fistula between the inner and middle ears or leakage of perilymph. Only two patients showed a slight postoperative recovery in hearing. Four patients complained of disequilibrium preoperatively, of whom two had resolution of disequilibrium postoperatively. Conclusion: A positive CTP test confirms PLF in patients without obvious intraoperative findings. The CTP test is considered more sensitive than endoscopic fistula confirmation. We consider that CTP test results are important indicators to decide the surgical indication for idiopathic PLF repair surgery. In our experience with the five cases, two of them showed improvements in both hearing and vestibular symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.