Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38560639›Full record

ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2022

High bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation: ReCre8 subanalysis.

Nicole D van Hemert, Pieter R Stella, Rik Rozemeijer, Mèra Stein, Peter Frambach, Adriaan O Kraaijeveld, Saskia Z Rittersma, Timion A Meijs, Geert E H Leenders, Pim van der Harst and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02328898 (A Prospective, Multi-Center, Open Label, Randomized Controlled, Two Arm Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of the Permanent Polymer Zotarolimus Eluting Stent Resolute Integrity Compared to the Polymer Free Amphilimus Eluting Stent Cre8), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02328898 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

A Prospective, Multi-Center, Open Label, Randomized Controlled, Two Arm Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of the Permanent Polymer Zotarolimus Eluting Stent Resolute Integrity Compared to the Polymer Free Amphilimus Eluting Stent Cre8

TypeinterventionalSponsorUMC UtrechtRan2014 to 2020Enrolled1,532ConditionsStable Angina Pectoris, Acute Coronary SyndromeArmsCre8 Stent, Resolute Integrity stent
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicole D van HemertDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Pieter R StellaDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Rik RozemeijerDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Mèra SteinDepartment of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Peter FrambachNational Institute of Cardiac Surgery and Interventional Cardiology, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Adriaan O KraaijeveldDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Saskia Z RittersmaDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Timion A MeijsDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Geert E H LeendersDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Pim van der HarstDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Pierfrancesco AgostoniDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Network Antwerp Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium.
Michiel VoskuilDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
ReCre8 Study Investigators
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLZNA Middelheim Hospital · BEZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: In an all-comers cohort undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), we aimed to assess prevalence of high bleeding risk (HBR) patients and impact of HBR and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) on clinical events. Background: HBR represents a complex subgroup of patients undergoing PCI. Methods: In the ReCre8 trial, patients undergoing PCI were stratified for troponin status and diabetes and randomized to a permanent polymer zotarolimus-eluting- or polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stent. Patients were treated with 12 months (troponin-positive) or one month (troponin-negative) of DAPT. We evaluated clinical outcomes in patients with and without HBR according to the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk criteria. Results: From a total of 1488 patients included in this subanalysis, 406 patients (27.3 %) were identified as being at HBR. Among HBR patients, target-lesion failure (TLF) was similar after one year yet was higher after three years (13.3 % vs. 9.1 %; p = 0.013), compared to non-HBR patients. There was no difference in Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3 to 5 bleeding, however BARC 2 to 5 bleeding was higher after three years with 4.9 % vs. 3.0 % (p = 0.037). There were no differences between troponin-positive (12-months DAPT) and -negative (1-month DAPT) HBR patients with respect to ischemic and bleeding outcomes. Conclusions: In this all-comers population of PCI patients, a higher TLF rate among HBR patients at long-term follow-up was found, underlining the complexities involving treatment of HBR patients. We did not observe statistically significant differences in BARC 3 to 5 bleeding between HBR and non-HBR patients regardless of DAPT duration. Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, unique identifier: NCT02328898.

Indexed as

Coronary artery diseaseDrug-eluting stentHigh bleeding riskPercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID38560639
PMCPMC10978429
OpenAlexW4308628130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.