Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38560615›Full record

ReviewTranslational medicine @ UniSa2024

Telerehabilitation: A Solution for Patients After Hip Fracture?

Alessia Bramanti, Rossella Ciurleo, Carmine Vecchione, Andrea Turolla, Noemi Piramide, Michele Ciccarelli, Erica Piramide, Marina Garofano, Michele Senatore, Mariaconsiglia Calabrese

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational medicine @ UniSa, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alessia BramantiDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Medical School of Salerno", University of Salerno, Italy.
Rossella CiurleoIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo of Messina, Italy.
Carmine VecchioneDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Medical School of Salerno", University of Salerno, Italy.
Andrea TurollaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Noemi PiramideCanopo Centro Studi, Salerno, Italy.
Michele CiccarelliDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Medical School of Salerno", University of Salerno, Italy.
Erica PiramideCanopo Centro Studi, Salerno, Italy.
Marina GarofanoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Medical School of Salerno", University of Salerno, Italy.
Michele Senatore"Ordine dei Fisioterapisti" of Salerno, Italy.
Mariaconsiglia CalabreseDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Medical School of Salerno", University of Salerno, Italy.
University of Salerno · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · ITCentro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo · ITUniversity of Cagliari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

- Hip fracture is the most common cause of hospitalization in frail geriatric subjects due to osteoporosis and recurrent falls. The clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation after surgery in patients with hip fractures recommend to start treatment early. However, the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic between December 2019 and January 2020 forced to lockdown. Thus, telerehabilitation seemed the best solution to remote assistance. In this scenario, the aim of our study is to assess the effects of telerehabilitation and to clarify and rearrange the knowledge about its usability and feasibility in patients after hip fracture in emergency conditions, such as the pandemic of SARS-CoV-2. Three databases were systematically searched from caption to December 2023, considering only articles published in peer-reviewed journals, with the use of three macro-areas: 'telerehabilitation', 'remote rehabilitation' and 'hip fracture'. In the present review, 26 articles were considered eligible and 10 were included. Heterogeneous results were found due to the different characteristics of the patients recruited in the studies, designs and type of the studies, and reporting/conducting of the research. Also, the typologies of telerehabilitation provided were various. In conclusion, this review demonstrated that telerehabilitation is safe, effective and well tolerated from patients and seems to be not inferior to the conventional physiotherapy. It also plays a positive role in psychological rehabilitation, in the prevention of complications and in the maintenance of achieved goals. However, further studies are needed to guide the clinical practice in providing the better posology and typology of telerehabilitation.

Indexed as

Hip fracturePhysiotherapyRemote rehabilitationTelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID38560615
PMCPMC10980289
OpenAlexW4393202498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.