ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2024
Accuracy of intraoperative approximation of pelvic tilt using preoperative standing radiographs.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Anterior approach surgeons who utilize intraoperative fluoroscopy often try to match a preoperative radiograph as a reference for intraoperative cup position. Every degree of inaccuracy in tilt leads to a roughly 0.7° change in anteversion. This study aimed to determine how closely pelvic tilt (PT) is approximated intraoperatively when compared to preoperative anteroposterior (AP) radiographs. Methods: This was a retrospective review of 193 primary THA's done by 2 surgeons at an academic tertiary referral center between September 2021-January 2023. There were 24 patients excluded for distorted anatomy, post-traumatic arthritis, insufficient x-rays, or a sacroiliac joint that could not be visualized on film. Data collected included age and BMI. PT was calculated using the formula, Tilt = -(ln((B/A) x (1/0.483)))/0.051. Value A is the distance from the base of the SI joint to the superior margin of the obturator foramen; value B is the height of the obturator foramen. Results: Mean preoperative PT was 0.2° versus intraoperative PT was 3.4° (p < 0.001). Mean absolute difference was 6.5°. 48% of patients (n = 81) had an absolute difference less than 5°, 31% (n = 52) between 5° and 10°, 14% (n = 24) between 10° and 15°, and 7% (n = 12) greater than 15°. There was no correlation between BMI or age and PT discrepancy. Conclusion: Of the patients, 21% had a discrepancy of 10° or greater between their preoperative radiographs and intraoperative fluoroscopic images. Surgeons should be aware of potential errors in cup positioning and be particularly diligent in high-risk cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.