Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38560561›Full record

ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2022

Underrepresentation of women in implantable cardioverter defibrillator trials.

Janet K Han, Andrea M Russo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sex-specific trends in ventricular arrhythmias among European implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Special issue: Women and cardiovascular trials.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Reduction in long-term mortality using remote device monitoring in a large real-world population of patients with implantable defibrillators.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Observational
  6. Sex differences in ICDs for primary prevention: Time to include women in ICD trials!American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janet K HanDivision of Cardiology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare and David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Andrea M RussoDivision of Cardiology, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, United States of America.
Cooper Medical School of Rowan University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are sex differences in the epidemiology and presentation of ventricular arrhythmias. Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is less common in women than in men. Women have been under-represented in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) trials evaluating the benefit of ICD therapy for primary and secondary prevention of SCD. Following ICD implantation, women are less likely to experience appropriate ICD therapy for ventricular arrhythmias, consistent with epidemiological findings of a lower rate of SCD in women. Sex differences in ICD implantation rates have also been noted for primary and secondary prevention of SCD in registries and large observational cohort studies. Reasons for these differences are unclear. Age and comorbidities at the time of presentation may be partially responsible, although sex bias, patient preference, or contribution of social determinants of health cannot be excluded. There are many unanswered questions regarding reasons for sex differences in ICD usage and under-representation of women in clinical device trials. Additional investigation is needed to better understand these differences to improve outcome of all patients who are at risk for sudden cardiac arrest.

Indexed as

DisparitiesImplantable cardioverter defibrillatorSex differences

Identifiers

PMID38560561
PMCPMC10978341
OpenAlexW4221031850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.