ArticleHeart rhythm O22024
Predictive utility of the impedance drop on AF recurrence using digital intraprocedural data linked to electronic health record data.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Local impedance drop in cardiac tissue during catheter ablation may be a valuable measure to guide atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures for greater effectiveness. Objective: The study sought to assess whether local impedance drop during catheter ablation to treat AF predicts 1-year AF recurrence and what threshold of impedance drop is most predictive. Methods: We identified patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation in the Mercy healthcare system. We downloaded AF ablation procedural data recorded by the CARTO system from a cloud-based analytical tool (CARTONET) and linked them to individual patient electronic health records. Average impedance drops in anatomical region of right and left pulmonary veins were calculated. Effectiveness was measured by a composite outcome of repeat ablation, AF rehospitalization, direct current cardioversion, or initialization of a new antiarrhythmic drug post-blanking period. The association between impedance drop and 1-year AF recurrence was assessed by logistic regression adjusting for demographics, clinical, and ablation characteristics. Bootstrapping was used to determine the most predictive threshold for impedance drop based on the Youden index. Results: Among 242 patients, 23.6% (n = 57) experienced 1-year AF recurrence. Patients in the lower third vs upper third of average impedance drop had a 5.9-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.81-21.8) higher risk of recurrence (37.0% vs 12.5%). The threshold of 7.2 Ω (95% CI 5.75-7.7 Ω) impedance drop best predicted AF recurrence, with sensitivity of 0.73 and positive predictive value of 0.33. Patients with impedance drop ≤7.2 Ω had 3.5-fold (95% CI 1.39-9.50) higher risk of recurrence than patients with impedance drop >7.2 Ω, and there was no statistical difference in adverse events between the 2 groups of patients. Sensitivity analysis on right and left wide antral circumferential ablation impedance drop was consistent. Conclusion: Average impedance drop is a strong predictor of clinical success in reducing AF recurrence but as a single criterion for predicting recurrence only reached 73% sensitivity and 33% positive predictive value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.