ArticleHeliyon2024
Identification and verification of AK4 as a protective immune-related biomarker in adipose-derived stem cells and breast cancer.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer (BC) remains the most common cancer among women, and novel post-surgical reconstruction techniques, including autologous fat transplantation, have emerged. While Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) are known to impact the viability of fat grafts, their influence on breast cancer progression remains unclear. This study aims to elucidate the genetic interplay between ADSCs and breast cancer, focusing on potential therapeutic targets. Methods: Using the GEO and TCGA databases, we pinpointed differentially expressed (DE) mRNAs, miRNAs, lncRNAs, and pseudogenes of ADSCs and BC. We performed functional enrichment analysis and constructed protein-protein interaction (PPI), RNA binding protein (RBP)-pseudogene-mRNA, and lncRNA-miRNA-transcription factor (TF)-gene networks. Our study delved into the correlation of AK4 expression with 33 different malignancies and examined its impact on prognostic outcomes across a pan-cancer cohort. Additionally, we scrutinized immune infiltration, microsatellite instability, and tumor mutational burden, and conducted single-cell analysis to further understand the implications of AK4 expression. We identified novel sample subtypes based on hub genes using the ConsensusClusterPlus package and examined their association with immune infiltration. The random forest algorithm was used to screen DE mRNAs between subtypes to validate the powerful prognostic prediction ability of the artificial neural network. Results: Our analysis identified 395 DE mRNAs, 3 DE miRNAs, 84 DE lncRNAs, and 26 DE pseudogenes associated with ADSCs and BC. Of these, 173 mRNAs were commonly regulated in both ADSCs and breast cancer, and 222 exhibited differential regulation. The PPI, RBP-pseudogene-mRNA, and lncRNA-miRNA-TF-gene networks suggested AK4 as a key regulator. Our findings support AK4 as a promising immune-related therapeutic target for a wide range of malignancies. We identified 14 characteristic genes based on the AK4-related cluster using the random forest algorithm. Our artificial neural network yielded excellent diagnostic performance in the testing cohort with AUC values of 0.994, 0.973, and 0.995, indicating its ability to distinguish between breast cancer and non-breast cancer cases. Conclusions: Our research sheds light on the dual role of ADSCs in BC at the genetic level and identifies AK4 as a key protective mRNA in breast cancer. We found that AK4 significantly predicts cancer prognosis and immunotherapy, indicating its potential as a therapeutic target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.