ReviewAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2022
Cardiac rehabilitation - The answer for the second chance.
Review in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the United States and worldwide, the leading cause of death in females is cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, compared to males, females have overall higher mortality rates, especially within the first few years of having an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Despite the increased awareness of CVD in females and established benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs, there is still delayed initiation of care, under-recognition of atypical presentations of angina in females, under referral of females to CR, and under-representation of females in CVD trials. In this paper, we will investigate the barriers to female participation in CR, explore the fundamental differences in physiology between males and females, and current limitations in CVD trials where females are under-represented. Finally, we aim to provide potential methods to increase enrollment of females in CR and CR related trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.