Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38560073›Full record

ReviewAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2022

Dare to dream? Cell-based therapies for heart failure after DREAM-HF: Review and roadmap for future clinical study.

Peter V Johnston, Amish N Raval, Timothy D Henry, Jay H Traverse, Carl J Pepine

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter V JohnstonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Amish N RavalDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Timothy D HenryCarl and Edyth Lindner Center for Research at the Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America.
Jay H TraverseMinneapolis Heart Institute Foundation at Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Carl J PepineDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials of cell-based therapies for heart failure have resulted in significant strides forward in our understanding of the potential the failing heart has for regeneration and repair. Yet, two decades on, the need for novel cell-based therapies for heart failure has never been greater. The DREAM-HF trial, which was presented as a late-breaking trial at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions 2021 did not meet the primary heart failure outcome, but did show a large, clinically significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients receiving cells, an effect that was most pronounced in patients with evidence of maladaptive inflammation. These results represent an important step forward in our understanding of how cell-based therapies can exert beneficial effects in patients with heart failure and should serve as a guide for future clinical efforts. In light of the results of DREAM-HF, this review serves to provide an understanding of the current state of cell-based therapies for heart failure, as well as to highlight major knowledge gaps and suggest guiding principles for clinical trials of cell therapy going forward. Using the knowledge gained from DREAM-HF along with the trials that preceded it, the potential for breakthrough cell-based therapies for heart failure in the coming decade is immense.

Indexed as

Cell therapyClinical trialHeart failureNovel therapies

Identifiers

PMID38560073
PMCPMC10978179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.