Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38560054›Full record

ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2022

Underrepresentation of women in cardiac imaging trials: A review.

Rachel-Maria Brown, Catherine Weinberg, Caroline Ong, Jennifer H Mieres

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Special issue: Women and cardiovascular trials.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel-Maria BrownDivision of Cardiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, United States of America.
Catherine WeinbergDivision of Cardiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, United States of America.
Caroline OngDivision of Cardiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, United States of America.
Jennifer H MieresDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Hempstead, NY, United States of America.
Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell · USNorthwell Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inclusion and equal representation of women in cardiovascular imaging trials are essential to provide insight into the factors impacting women's heart health and outcomes. Despite heart disease being the leading cause of mortality for women in the United States, women have been underrepresented in cardiovascular clinical trials, including imaging trials. Research demonstrates that women have key sex-specific differences in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease, the evolution of disease state, and disease manifestation (Solimene, 2010; Nevsky et al., 2011 [1,2]). This understanding and acknowledgment come decades after clinical providers have extrapolated data from cardiovascular disease clinical trials conducted primarily on Caucasian men, assuming the data were generalizable to sex, race, and ethnicity. The current cardiology society guidelines, which recommend optimal medical therapies for various cardiovascular diseases, are based on trials predominantly focused on men rather than women. Sex-based research, governmental and institutional task forces, and policies on gender equity have made inroads into the disproportionate number of women's enrollment in clinical research. The National Institutes of Health in the 1990s set forth requirements on incorporating women and minorities in research, including clinical trials (Mastroianni et al., 1994; Mieres et al., 2014 [3,4]). Continued progress is imperative to improve the gap in the number of women enrolled in clinical research trials.

Indexed as

CardiovascularImagingResearchUnderrepresentationWomen

Identifiers

PMID38560054
PMCPMC10978205
OpenAlexW4211002459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.