Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38560048›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Classification of high-grade glioblastoma and single brain metastases using a new SCAT-inception model trained with MRI images.

Cheng Lv, Xu-Jun Shu, Hui Chang, Jun Qiu, Shuo Peng, Keping Yu, Sheng-Bo Chen, Hong Rao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Cheng LvSchool of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Xu-Jun ShuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Hui ChangDepartment of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Jun QiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin, Sichuan Province, China.
Shuo PengDepartment of Computer Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, China.
Keping YuSchool of Science and Engineering, Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan.
Sheng-Bo ChenSchool of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Hong RaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Nanchang University · CNHenan University · CNHosei University · JPJinggangshan University · CNJinling Institute of Technology · CNNanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CNSecond People’s Hospital of Yibin · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: Glioblastoma (GBM) and brain metastasis (MET) are the two most common intracranial tumors. However, the different pathogenesis of the two tumors leads to completely different treatment options. In terms of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), GBM and MET are extremely similar, which makes differentiation by imaging extremely challenging. Therefore, this study explores an improved deep learning algorithm to assist in the differentiation of GBM and MET. Materials and methods: For this study, axial contrast-enhanced T1 weight (ceT1W) MRI images from 321 cases of high-grade gliomas and solitary brain metastasis were collected. Among these, 251 out of 270 cases were selected for the experimental dataset (127 glioblastomas and 124 metastases), 207 cases were chosen as the training dataset, and 44 cases as the testing dataset. We designed a new deep learning algorithm called SCAT-inception (Spatial Convolutional Attention inception) and used five-fold cross-validation to verify the results. Results: By employing the newly designed SCAT-inception model to predict glioblastomas and brain metastasis, the prediction accuracy reached 92.3%, and the sensitivity and specificity reached 93.5 and 91.1%, respectively. On the external testing dataset, our model achieved an accuracy of 91.5%, which surpasses other model performances such as VGG, UNet, and GoogLeNet. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the SCAT-inception architecture could extract more subtle features from ceT1W images, provide state-of-the-art performance in the differentiation of GBM and MET, and surpass most existing approaches.

Indexed as

brain metastasisdeep learningglioblastomaMRISCAT-inception

Identifiers

PMID38560048
PMCPMC10979639
OpenAlexW4392814600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.