Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38560039›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2024

Comparison of trigeminal lateralization with differing stimulants.

Tiffany Chen, Nicolas S Poupore, Michael C Shih, Thomas S Edwards, Shaun A Nguyen, Zachary M Soler, Rodney J Schlosser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Comparison of trigeminal lateralization with differing stimulants.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tiffany ChenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9797-6920
Nicolas S PouporeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6907-488X
Michael C ShihDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.
Thomas S EdwardsDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6290-9506
Shaun A NguyenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.
Zachary M SolerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.
Rodney J SchlosserDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trigeminal-specific stimulants have been shown to activate different receptors preferentially and this likely accounts for variation in sensory perception. It is unclear whether trigeminal sensitivity is similar across different transient receptor potential (TRP) receptors or if dysfunction of different receptors results in differing patient symptoms. Therefore, a prospective cohort study was conducted, consisting of trigeminal lateralization testing with three different stimulants (eucalyptol, isothiocyanate, acetic acid), olfaction testing with Sniffin' Sticks, and measurement of various patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A total of 50 participants were enrolled across the olfactory spectrum. Mean TDI score was 27.1 ± 8.3 (range 7.0-39.5) with 38% normosmic and 62% dysosmic. Mean trigeminal lateralization scores out of 20 in the overall cohort were 16.18 (2.78) for eucalyptol, 14.94 (3.49) for mustard oil, and 15.28 (3.68) for vinegar. Eucalyptol showed a significant correlation with threshold scores of Sniffin' Sticks. A significant correlation was found between acetic acid and various PROMs. None of the lateralization scores of the trigeminal stimulants correlated to each other significantly and there was no correlation to age. The lack of correlation suggests that the measured sensitivity of one type of TRP receptor may not translate to similar sensitivity of the other receptors. Additional investigations with TRPV1 and TRPA1 agonists are needed to corroborate our findings.

Indexed as

chemosensoryolfactiontrigeminalTRP receptor

Identifiers

PMID38560039
PMCPMC10979039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.