ArticleACS omega2024
Power of Light: Raman Spectroscopy and Machine Learning for the Detection of Lung Cancer.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fusion of Raman and FTIR Spectroscopy Data Uncovers Physiological Changes Associated with Lung Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, emphasizing the urgent need for reliable and efficient diagnostic methods. Conventional approaches often involve invasive procedures and can be time-consuming and costly, thereby delaying the effective treatment. The current study explores the potential of Raman spectroscopy, as a promising noninvasive technique, by analyzing human blood plasma samples from lung cancer patients and healthy controls. In a benchmark study, 16 machine learning models were evaluated by employing four strategies: the combination of dimensionality reduction with classifiers; application of feature selection prior to classification; stand-alone classifiers; and a unified predictive model. The models showed different performances due to the inherent complexity of the data, achieving accuracies from 0.77 to 0.85 and areas under the curve for receiver operating characteristics from 0.85 to 0.94. Hybrid methods incorporating dimensionality reduction and feature selection algorithms present the highest figures of merit. Nevertheless, all machine learning models deliver creditable scores and demonstrate that Raman spectroscopy represents a powerful method for future in vitro diagnostics of lung cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.